Center for New Testament Textual Studies' New Testament Critical Apparatus

Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
This post has 10 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 734
Josh Hunt | Forum Activity | Posted: Tue, Dec 4 2018 6:48 AM

https://www.logos.com/product/32501/center-for-new-testament-textual-studies-new-testament-critical-apparatus

This looks like an interesting tool, but a little expensive at $100. Is there anything else that does what this does but cheaper--maybe something I already have?

Posts 1484
John Kight | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 6:53 AM

Not likely to the extent that CNTTS does. Its EXHAUSTIVE and well worth $100 if you're working in or interested in the field of textual criticism.

For book reviews and more visit sojotheo.com 

Posts 9459
Denise | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 7:47 AM

Depends if you need exhaustive. Few do. Actually the free one in the Files subforum is a nice in-between the NA/UNS ones and CNTTS.  I'm out the door, else I'd find it.


Posts 734
Josh Hunt | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 9:54 AM

I looked and couldn't find it, so if anyone can point me to that free version, I'd like to check that out

Posts 9459
Denise | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 10:49 AM

Josh Hunt:

I looked and couldn't find it, so if anyone can point me to that free version, I'd like to check that out

I'm back. 

https://community.logos.com/forums/t/46696.aspx 

I like it, since a quick glance answers a lot of questions. It doesn't have the popups per mss, and thus assumes a working knowledge of at least the big ones. OTOH, it adds quick pointers to Byz/WH distinctions, a layer that the others don't (except the FL one).

The CNTTS one is nice because you can color code the listed mss's by approx date, and usefulness. Another quick glance. OTOH, the formatting of Logos' CNTTS is inefficient (data per verse extensive), so I keep it inattached in my NT layout. Else quite molassas-y.

The above posting also includes another series of files for the mss's:

https://community.logos.com/forums/p/47467/352738.aspx#352738 


Posts 4584
David Paul | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:04 AM

This should be included in a Base Package.

Posts 734
Josh Hunt | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:18 AM

David Paul:

This should be included in a Base Package.

I agree!

Posts 734
Josh Hunt | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:19 AM

Denise:

Josh Hunt:

I looked and couldn't find it, so if anyone can point me to that free version, I'd like to check that out

I'm back. 

https://community.logos.com/forums/t/46696.aspx 

I like it, since a quick glance answers a lot of questions. It doesn't have the popups per mss, and thus assumes a working knowledge of at least the big ones. OTOH, it adds quick pointers to Byz/WH distinctions, a layer that the others don't (except the FL one).

The CNTTS one is nice because you can color code the listed mss's by approx date, and usefulness. Another quick glance. OTOH, the formatting of Logos' CNTTS is inefficient (data per verse extensive), so I keep it inattached in my NT layout. Else quite molassas-y.

The above posting also includes another series of files for the mss's:

https://community.logos.com/forums/p/47467/352738.aspx#352738 

Thanks!

Posts 1306
Forum MVP
Veli Voipio | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:35 AM

Denise:
the formatting of Logos' CNTTS is inefficient (data per verse extensive),

Logos should design an overly user-friendly user interface for CNTTS Embarrassed

Gold package, and original language material and ancient text material, SIL and UBS books, discourse Hebrew OT and Greek NT. PC with Windows 8.1

Posts 9459
Denise | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:59 AM

Denise:

Josh Hunt:

I looked and couldn't find it, so if anyone can point me to that free version, I'd like to check that out

https://community.logos.com/forums/t/46696.aspx 

I like it, since a quick glance answers a lot of questions. It doesn't have the popups per mss, and thus assumes a working knowledge of at least the big ones. OTOH, it adds quick pointers to Byz/WH distinctions, a layer that the others don't (except the FL one).

Correction: CNTTS does include handling by Robinson (Byz), Holmes (SBL) and the 1873 TR. I do like Trigalles inclusion in SBL ... a nice touch.


Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS