KJV Bible 1611 unedited version

Page 1 of 1 (13 items)
This post has 12 Replies | 2 Followers

Posts 98
Wayne levi Price | Forum Activity | Posted: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:05 AM

Where is the KJV 1611? currently it is unavailable in all the resources. You do not offer this and it is a shame. We have thousands of dollars of library content and books that are hundreds if not thousands of years old, but yet, we are missing one of the most prize possession in terms of COLLECTOR'S Items in the world. How sad, indeed.

We need to get the KJV 1611 - the old one before revisions. 

Posts 9701
Denise | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:18 AM

I think you've got it wrong. It's the KIV. The 1611 was j-less. Ioking ... oops ... Joking.

Though I'd prefer a facsimile.  Ok, both.

BTW, welcome to the forums! And I agree on the Logos refusing to prevent accidental deletes. That rule was made circa 2008 following the election.


Posts 98
Wayne levi Price | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:23 AM

I did not know it had no J's - "awesome" - I want the one that is "J" less for my collection.

They have books in this collection that are far less valuable than the 1611 KJV Bible.

Imagine - a Bible Collection and Christian Comprehensive Book collection, 'without the KJV 1600 -- now, that is a joke if I ever heard one. Big Smile They need to fix this problem - Pronto.  Big Smile

Thanks for your comment. Peace to you always. 

Posts 26628
Forum MVP
JT (alabama24) | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:48 AM

Levi Price:
We need to get the KJV 1611 - the old one before revisions.

With the Apocrypha, right? And in Blackletter only. Just like this:

OSX & iOS | Mac Logs | PC LogsInstall

Posts 9701
Denise | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 11:54 AM

Ok, ok ... after all the spelling errors are fixed. It just amazes me that King Iames would grant approval. Probably they used a a bad facsimile converter, instead of typing it in like Logos doesn't.


Posts 17636
Forum MVP
Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :) | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 12:33 PM

Levi Price:
Where is the KJV 1611?

He, She, Wicked, ... ? Which printed 1611 KJV version should be used as a basis ? wikipedia article => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorized_King_James_Version mentions different KJV 1611 print versions of Ruth 3:15 having "he went into the city" and "she went into the city" Wicked lacked not so "thou shalt commit adultery" Embarrassed (is among 1,500 misprints over many years)

Logos Wiki has => Logos Speaks with links => Logos’ KJV choice 1 , => Logos’ KJV choice 2 , and => Logos’ KJV choice 3 that includes:

Bob Pritchett:

The 1611 text, as originally published in 1611, has rarely been used since. Almost every KJV published since has been a variant. The most popular and widely available "facsimiles" are actually "reproductions" that use old looking type and reproduce the 1611 text. (Which won't match almost any KJV Bible you've ever seen, since most of them are the 1769 or approximate the "1900" text.) For more information on how to tell if yours is "the 1611":

http://www.greatsite.com/facsimile-reproductions/kingjames-1611.html

The New Cambridge Paragraph Bible gives the reader as closely as possible the exact text that the King James translators themselves decided on—but which was far from perfectly realised in the first edition => The New Cambridge Paragraph Bible with the Apocrypha, rev. ed. (NCPB)

Other Bibles to consider: 1535 Coverdale => The Holy Scriptures Faithfully and Truly Translated is included in English Bible Collection that also has 1526 Tyndale Bible and 1560 Geneva Bible

Another Bible is the most recent translation in KJV tradition  => Modern English Version (MEV)

Keep Smiling Smile

Posts 98
Wayne levi Price | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 12:48 PM

Yes, We need that one for sure. I cannot believe our Logos Collection does not have it. What a terrible situation for a Bible collection to be in. 

Posts 98
Wayne levi Price | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 1:16 PM

Thanks, but I want the KJV Bible with all the mistakes. This should be a part of our Collection without a doubt and it is a shame it is not available. Big Smile

Posts 98
Wayne levi Price | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 1:29 PM

Yes, we need to demand that we get this book added to the logos collections.

It is a shame it is not already available. 

Posts 98
Wayne levi Price | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 1:31 PM

Thanks, but I want the KJV Bible with all the mistakes. This should be a part of our Collection without a doubt and it is a shame it is not available. Big Smile

Posts 2033
Jan Krohn | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 1:39 PM

These mistakes might have been inspired. We should not dismiss them so easily (especially the adultery one Stick out tongueEmbarrassed).

Past IT Consultant. Past Mission Worker. Entrepreneur. Future Seminary Student.
Why Amazon sucks: Full background story of my legal dispute with the online giant

Posts 25640
Forum MVP
MJ. Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 2:30 PM

Levi Price:
It is a shame it is not already available.

Given the difficulty in getting other volumes of historic importance out of pre-pub .... I wouldn't hold my breath. However, there are several Bibles of the period in https://www.logos.com/product/49645/library-of-early-english-history

Orthodox Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."

Posts 17636
Forum MVP
Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :) | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Dec 4 2018 2:54 PM

Levi Price:
... should be a part of our Collection without a doubt ...

The New Cambridge Paragraph Bible with the Apocrypha, rev. ed. (NCPB) is included in many Logos 8 libraries.

Text Comparison shows some word differences in Matthew 6:1-15

NCPB mentioned Hosea 6:5 in its introduction

Levi Price:
... I want the KJV Bible with all the mistakes.

Manually setting letters for printing provided opportunity for variety of mistakes in various printed editions so a 1611 KJV with all the mistakes would be an amalgamation (since no one printed edition had all 1,500 typos)

Keep Smiling Smile

Page 1 of 1 (13 items) | RSS