What's the difference between these two books?

Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
This post has 5 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 2281
Ronald Quick | Forum Activity | Replied: Sun, Feb 17 2019 11:41 AM

The table of contents look identical.  The only difference I can see is about $3.00 (16.99 and 13.99).

Posts 3005
Milkman | Forum Activity | Replied: Sun, Feb 17 2019 12:17 PM

Yeah that's pretty well what is saw too. I have the commentary with the whitish cover and compared both on Amazon and they do in fact look the same.

thanks.

mm.

Posts 2756
Erwin Stull, Sr. | Forum Activity | Replied: Sun, Feb 17 2019 1:14 PM

From what I can see, the only difference is that the $16.99 one has the General Editors Comments and the other doesn't.

Also, I did notice a different ISBN.

Posts 3005
Milkman | Forum Activity | Replied: Sun, Feb 17 2019 1:54 PM

So I'm thinking they're essentially the same. maybe one was a hard cover and the other a soft? Either way, I don't think anyone will be missing anything if they got either.

Rangers lost to Ottawa 6-3 just now Crying

mm.

Posts 2756
Erwin Stull, Sr. | Forum Activity | Replied: Sun, Feb 17 2019 2:27 PM

Milkman:

So I'm thinking they're essentially the same. maybe one was a hard cover and the other a soft? Either way, I don't think anyone will be missing anything if they got either.

Rangers lost to Ottawa 6-3 just now Crying

Whether it was hard cover or soft cover wouldn't matter to us. The Editor Comments is the only significant change I can detect (judging from the toc), and I don't see them being worth a $3.00 difference. I could be wrong, but I don't see it.

Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS