It would be an amazing help to have someone in Logos (eg Mr Heiser) write a commentary on Gesenius' Hebrew grammar. I find Gesenius very difficult to follow. A commentary on it explaining what Gesenius meant (if anything at all in some places) by what he wrote would help a lot. Maybe even better would be to write a Hebrew grammar that includes every grammatical point (except the places where he is not making any point at all - there are many of these) in Gesenius in modern accessible English. Other Hebrew grammars frequently leave you with no answer on many points of grammar. Gesenius is very difficult to follow in many instances.