which commentary in your exegetical bible study choice? Hermeneia\Anchor or ICC? or all?
I like Icc and hermeneia, and also love anchor. but what's difference in those excellent resources?
please give me your precious suggestion.
Blessings
Ben
2 Peter 3:18 But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity. Amen.
Comments
-
Ben said:
please give me your precious suggestion.
All of the above - you share my taste in commentaries. [:D] Serious, although I went for Anchor first, if there were no other considerations I'd recommend Hermeneia - it is the more consistent in quality across the various volumes than Anchor. I've only used one volume of the ICC so I can't really speak to it yet.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
If I had the money for these sets I would go for Hermeneia then Anchor then ICC (mainly because this can be the most dated of the 3 series).
In terms of evaluating individual commentaries consider bestcommentaries.com
Prov. 15:23
0 -
Thanks, I just understanding about those excellent resources from google books!
2 Peter 3:18 But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity. Amen.
0 -
I concur with Kevin.
I added the Continental commentaries today, it will be interesting to get into them.
I've always liked the Genesis and Psalm volumes from that series.
0
