Bug: References to fragment names in Qumran Sectarian Manuscripts are incorrectly interpreted.

Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Posts 13064
Forum MVP
Mark Barnes | Forum Activity | Posted: Fri, Oct 1 2010 3:44 AM | Locked

In the Qumran Sectarian Manuscripts the References to whole documents and fragments is incorrect.These references (which shouldn't require a line or column number) have to be written as 1Q20 0:0 instead of just 1Q20.

This affects linking and the ability to navigate easily within the resource. There are multiple problems with QSM which significantly reduce the value of the resource, so it would be very helpful to have an indication on whether progress is currently being made in correcting these:

 

Posts 3163
Dominick Sela | Forum Activity | Replied: Fri, Oct 1 2010 7:13 AM | Locked

Thanks Mark, and let's not forget about the broken links in one of the DSS books as well:

http://community.logos.com/forums/p/20680/155259.aspx#155259

http://community.logos.com/forums/p/14494/125422.aspx

Posts 4077
Melissa Snyder | Forum Activity | Replied: Fri, Oct 1 2010 9:36 AM | Locked

Mark Barnes:
In the Qumran Sectarian Manuscripts the References to whole documents and fragments is incorrect.These references (which shouldn't require a line or column number) have to be written as 1Q20 0:0 instead of just 1Q20.

Development is still working on this. I've added a link to this thread to the open case.

Mark Barnes:

The problems with DSS appear to be fixed when I test it using your example in the above thread.

Mark Barnes:

Development is still working on problems with QSM and Westminster morph search.

Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS