The Cloud

Russ White
Russ White Member Posts: 552 ✭✭
edited November 20 in English Forum

I see Logos is "in love with" the cloud. As an IT professional, I must tell you that "the cloud" is going to crush Logos, if Logos isn't careful. "The Cloud" is just another name for "the community at large." While I understand the strong desire to jump on the bandwagon of being a member of the community, take a lesson from someone who lives this life:

The Borg are only cool in the movies.

The cloud is a dangerous idea. I would seriously suggest spending some time reading folks are critical of "the cloud" before going farther down this road. For instance, how do you delete things once they are in "the cloud?" You can't. What about when you want a resource "the cloud" no longer wants you to have? No local copies. What about when you're in the middle of the desert, and have no Internet access? Or a persecuted Christian in China, and want resources, but don't want folks to know, precisely, where you are?

As Logos goes down this road, it is committing everyone who uses this software to a specific worldview--a worldview many people would argue is not Christian (including me).

Russ

«13

Comments

  • Randall Hartman
    Randall Hartman Member Posts: 502 ✭✭

    Speaking of that, I seriously had a guy tell me that the white streaks in the sky from overhead jets were a gas designed by the government to control all of the people.  Uh, you don't happen to drive a white van do you?

  • Ken McGuire
    Ken McGuire Member Posts: 2,074 ✭✭✭

    There are serious privacy issues for cloud computing.  Anyone on the pipeline from my computer to Logos, and especially both ends are security risks.  However, Logos 4 DOES allow the user to use their resources without any internet connectivity at all.  Yes, it will not keep itself updated.  Yes, it will not keep reading plans synced between computers.  No Google Maps, Reading Lists, etc.

    We beta testers did argue about this.  For better or worse, it advantages for many of us outweigh the disadvantages.  There are more than a few hints that Logos will allow us to use our resources via the web instead of just on our computer, but for now, we DO have local copies.  That is why L4 has such large initial downloads.  Logos has promised to mail resources on DVD's if necessary, and you CAN turn off the internet features.  If you cannot get a DVD to you, it will likely be hard to get either a computer or book in any format to you, so it is hardly Logos' fault.

    The Gospel is not ... a "new law," on the contrary, ... a "new life." - William Julius Mann

    L8 Anglican, Lutheran and Orthodox Silver, Reformed Starter, Academic Essentials

    L7 Lutheran Gold, Anglican Bronze

  • Robert Pavich
    Robert Pavich Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭

    Russ,

    Yes...they are committed.

    Bob has given a lot of very good reasons why also...

    Your points have been brought up several times during the beta cycle and there are ways to deal with them all. Possibly Bob might chime in or point you to his answers.

     

    You can use Logos "off the grid" indefinitely if you'd like...There are certain things you won't get is all...syncing, Home page reloads, Sermon downloads...etc.

     

    As for the cloud giving you things you don't want; you can "hide them"  and they go away and don't come back...so yes...you can delete them.

    And as for downloading resources that the cloud "no longer wants you to have"? I'm not sure what you are talking about there...do you have a specific fear that Logos can address?

     

    Question: if you were using V3 and you were hiding out in China undercover and didn't want anyone to know where you are...how would you get disks and remain anonymous?

    Robert Pavich

    For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__

  • Bohuslav Wojnar
    Bohuslav Wojnar Member Posts: 3,466 ✭✭✭

    RussWhite said:

    As Logos goes down this road, it is committing everyone who uses this software to a specific worldview--a worldview many people would argue is not Christian (including me).

    Get a copy of DVD with the resources or download them and then shut down the Internet in the Setup. Stop syncing by the Command bar and you can use your Logos without any cloud.

    Bohuslav

  • Frank Sauer
    Frank Sauer Member Posts: 1,758 ✭✭✭

    As one of the beta testers and someone who had an IT background I was and still am anti cloud. However it is a business decision that will allow Logos to save a good amount of resources on the Customer Service and Technical Support end of their model.

    Still hoping that they have a change of heart there, but it does not seem to be anything in the near future.

    Logos 10 - OpenSuse Tumbleweed, Windows 11, Android 15 & Android 14

  • Russ White
    Russ White Member Posts: 552 ✭✭

    Um, no. But I'm seriously involved in Internet level security, and security in the cloud worries me a great deal more than it does most people. I know this might seem "weird," but if you sat in meetings with DHS and various classified military groups, and discussed "the cloud" as I have, you would experience a serious eye opening.

    Russ

    (wishing I could combine these answers, but I don't see how to on this forum?)

  • Wes Saad
    Wes Saad Member Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭

    Russ,

    This was also discussed in the beta forums and some shared your concern, particularly when considering believers serving in dangerous locations. There are ways to avoid privacy issues

    But I think the cloud concept implemented by Logos does not quite match your description. It is not a community thing, per se, in that it is not designed to enhance Logos community interaction, but it greatly simplifies the process of updating the software and resources as well as back up and synchronize notes. As a pastor who works from a church office and from my home computer I love the sync features.

    I trust Logos with my data and even if I didn't I would not be too worried about them reading my study notes or looking at my highlights! Might learn 'em a thing or two.

    As for worldview, I'm really not sure what worldview would be involved in this. What is "not Christian" about simplifying the process of updating, backing up, or synchronizing material? I am not sure where a moral value could even remotely be associated to these things. 

  • John Fugh, Jr.
    John Fugh, Jr. Member Posts: 651 ✭✭

    I trust Logos with my data and even if I didn't I would not be too worried about them reading my study notes or looking at my highlights! Might learn 'em a thing or two.

     

    I have no reason not to truth Logos either.  But, Russ does raise a interesting point about the pipe that exists between the users and the servers at Logos.  Is it secure?  What type of encryption is used?  Who has access?  I am not a conspiracy theorist, but I worked many years as a Information Security Professional (CISSP, MCSE).

     

    Yes, I trust logos, but what if logos (God forbid) is bought in the future by a not-so-reputable company?

     

    John

  • Bohuslav Wojnar
    Bohuslav Wojnar Member Posts: 3,466 ✭✭✭

    RussWhite said:

    Um, no. But I'm seriously involved in Internet level security, and security in the cloud worries me a great deal more than it does most people. I know this might seem "weird," but if you sat in meetings with DHS and various classified military groups, and discussed "the cloud" as I have, you would experience a serious eye opening.

    Russ

    (wishing I could combine these answers, but I don't see how to on this forum?)

    Russ, I lived longer part of my life in the communist regime. The secret police followed us all the time. We used to have a saying that "walls have ears". But what worse might happen to us. Somebody will steal my sermons? I have MP3s with all of them on the web. My notes? Yes, I might have some non-politically correct notes. We live in understanding that our cell phone calls are recorded (at least here in Europe). Computers can be hacked by 15 year old boys, yes, but that is how this world looks like. It is the other side of the moon, I would say. I can live with it.

    Bohuslav

  • spitzerpl
    spitzerpl Member Posts: 4,998

    Well, I have a funny feeling the powers that be at Logos thought hard about "the cloud" before jumping in. I have a funny feeling their sitting on a handsome amount of hardware to make all these huge downloads and syncing possible. They are in and better or worse I think the song being sung is "no turning back....no turning back...."

    Personally, I'm glad for the cloud. My information is in the cloud whether I like it or not. I certainly won't challenge your expertise in the area, but neither will I ignore Bob's record of thoughtful decision making as far as how Logos will utilize "the cloud."

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,978

    Yes, I trust logos, but what if logos (God forbid) is bought in the future by a not-so-reputable company?

    No joke, we asked this in beta.  Bob's response was that Logos is a privately held corporation.  He was some 30-40 years from retirement and he has no plans on selling.

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • spitzerpl
    spitzerpl Member Posts: 4,998

    He was some 30-40 years from retirement and he has no plans on selling.

    I guess I should stop writing that proposal...

  • Russ White
    Russ White Member Posts: 552 ✭✭

    For now. And that's what really bothers me. If Logos is really committed to this path, then there will be a point where you can't use Logos off the cloud. That, in fact, is the point of the cloud, in the end. It's not the current state of things, it's the trajectory this starts.

    Yes, I know it saves support costs. What's the human cost of saving support costs, though? The journey might be sweet, but the destination might really not be where you want to be.

    The problem with deleting things is you can "hide them," but you can't ever delete them. Ever. Again, that's the point of the cloud, that no information can ever be deleted. The cloud isn't commercially interesting if data can be deleted.

    For resources that disappear, there is a recent case with Amazon and the Kindle. A specific book was released into the Kindle, and Amazon decided, for various reasons, that it "wasn't appropriate content." The book was removed without the knowledge or consent of the Kindle's users, and a refund for the purchase price placed in the user's account. This is all fine, as long as the folks determining what should and shouldn't be removed from in front of your eyes are trustworthy. But we're all human, aren't we? And we can all succumb to political and financial pressure. 21st century book burnings will simply require a button that's pressed, and the content disappears from everywhere except special "containers" within "the cloud" where it's allowed to exist, like a virus in a laboratory.

    Finally, there is the issue of data leaks. This is another area where it might not seem like a big deal. I don't care if Logos knows what books I own. What if Logos goes out of business, and that information is transferred to another party? Or what if Logos is bought by a company without the same scruples we assume are in place now? In fact, another piece of "the cloud" is the idea of having multiple "fronts" that each appear to be small "niche" companies, but which are all owned by a small number of "back end" players, who gather the data up to build a complete "dossier" on each person's life.

    So, yes, there are specific things Logos can address.

    1. Don't ever remove a book I own. IE, if I own it, and it's on my hard drive, make it so it can never be removed, that it's always possible to have local books which can be run locally, and not touched, or even possibly seen, by "the cloud."

    2. Explain what the deletion policy is once something has been "hidden." Is it really deleted? Or is it just on some backup someplace?

    3. How much information is Logos drawing from my system? Google, for instance, rates your intelligence based on the way you type and what you search for, and then tailors their results to how intelligent they think you are. They save every possible search you make, and combine it with the contents of your email, the maps information they have, the maps information you search for, the videos you watch on YouTube, everything you post on Facebook, and everything they can get from your medical records (some of which they already have access to), to build a profile about you that you wouldn't believe. Where is the line drawn with Logos, specifically?

    4. How much information can third party players gather from my use of Logos because it's on "the cloud?" Logos might have strict privacy policies, but just like the US Gov't gets the British to spy on US citizens (because it's illegal for the CIA, for instance, to do so), some companies do the same thing with their user data. For instance, you go to a web site and browse around. The web site owner says they never sell your information. What they don't tell you is that Google Analytics is running on the web site, as well, so Google is gathering your information, and sending it all over the place.

    So, yes, I have concerns. Yes, I've seen all of this stuff done in the real world. Yes, I'm something of a security geek--I have very expensive door locks, I shred everything, I have strong firewalls, I have blinds on my windows, etc.--but I've learned what people can do on the backend, and it scares me.

    I understand the drive. What worries me are the unintended consequences.

    At least that's one engineer's perspective.

    Russ

  • Russ White
    Russ White Member Posts: 552 ✭✭

    Oh, and one other thing that would help: Logos should "fail open." If it can't reach "the cloud," it should always revert to a state of using a local license file and local files for all access. In other words, it should never fail in a state that causes the software to be unusable if "the cloud" fails, or can't be reached, or the end user needs to "override" the cloud.

    Doors should fail closed. Routers and firewalls should fail open. Software that contains data I created, or rely on, should fail in a way that allows me more access than I might otherwise have, rather than less.

    Just one more point to consider.

    Russ

  • Bohuslav Wojnar
    Bohuslav Wojnar Member Posts: 3,466 ✭✭✭

    RussWhite said:

    Oh, and one other thing that would help: Logos should "fail open." If it can't reach "the cloud," it should always revert to a state of using a local license file and local files for all access. In other words, it should never fail in a state that causes the software to be unusable if "the cloud" fails, or can't be reached, or the end user needs to "override" the cloud.

    Doors should fail closed. Routers and firewalls should fail open. Software that contains data I created, or rely on, should fail in a way that allows me more access than I might otherwise have, rather than less.

    Just one more point to consider.

    Russ

    As far as I know it does that. I used Logos a few times without Internet and it was OK.

    Bohuslav

  • Damian McGrath
    Damian McGrath Member Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭

    RussWhite said:

    Yes, I know it saves support costs. What's the human cost of saving support costs, though? The journey might be sweet, but the destination might really not be where you want to be.

    There may be a reduction in the number of support staff answering queries about lost license keys. The money will be used to employ more people in other areas and ensures the ongoing financial stability of the company.

     

    RussWhite said:

    The problem with deleting things is you can "hide them," but you can't ever delete them. Ever. Again, that's the point of the cloud, that no information can ever be deleted. The cloud isn't commercially interesting if data can be deleted.

    The resource is deleted from your hard drive but, as with Logos 3.0, your license key still holds the information that you have purchased that resource.

     

    RussWhite said:

    For resources that disappear, there is a recent case with Amazon and the Kindle. A specific book was released into the Kindle, and Amazon decided, for various reasons, that it "wasn't appropriate content." The book was removed without the knowledge or consent of the Kindle's users, and a refund for the purchase price placed in the user's account. This is all fine, as long as the folks determining what should and shouldn't be removed from in front of your eyes are trustworthy. But we're all human, aren't we? And we can all succumb to political and financial pressure. 21st century book burnings will simply require a button that's pressed, and the content disappears from everywhere except special "containers" within "the cloud" where it's allowed to exist, like a virus in a laboratory.

    Amazon sold a book that they did not have permission to sell. That's illegal. The purchasers did not have a right to that book on their Kindles. A very particular circumstance.

     

    RussWhite said:

    Finally, there is the issue of data leaks. This is another area where it might not seem like a big deal. I don't care if Logos knows what books I own. What if Logos goes out of business, and that information is transferred to another party? Or what if Logos is bought by a company without the same scruples we assume are in place now? In fact, another piece of "the cloud" is the idea of having multiple "fronts" that each appear to be small "niche" companies, but which are all owned by a small number of "back end" players, who gather the data up to build a complete "dossier" on each person's life.

    All possible with or without "the cloud."

     

    RussWhite said:

    1. Don't ever remove a book I own. IE, if I own it, and it's on my hard drive, make it so it can never be removed, that it's always possible to have local books which can be run locally, and not touched, or even possibly seen, by "the cloud."

    There's no threat of this. Plus, turn off your internet connection and they'll never know you are there.

     

    RussWhite said:

    2. Explain what the deletion policy is once something has been "hidden." Is it really deleted? Or is it just on some backup someplace?

    See above.

     

    RussWhite said:

    3. How much information is Logos drawing from my system? Google, for instance, rates your intelligence based on the way you type and what you search for, and then tailors their results to how intelligent they think you are. They save every possible search you make, and combine it with the contents of your email, the maps information they have, the maps information you search for, the videos you watch on YouTube, everything you post on Facebook, and everything they can get from your medical records (some of which they already have access to), to build a profile about you that you wouldn't believe. Where is the line drawn with Logos, specifically?

    They have been able to draw, with our permission, a great amount of detail under Logos 3.0. It is the same with 4.0. Go to Program Settings and chose to either send data anonymously or not to send data at all.

     

    RussWhite said:

    4. How much information can third party players gather from my use of Logos because it's on "the cloud?" Logos might have strict privacy policies, but just like the US Gov't gets the British to spy on US citizens (because it's illegal for the CIA, for instance, to do so), some companies do the same thing with their user data. For instance, you go to a web site and browse around. The web site owner says they never sell your information. What they don't tell you is that Google Analytics is running on the web site, as well, so Google is gathering your information, and sending it all over the place.

    Not sure about a privacy policy. There should be one and it should be readily accessible. This is a good question.

     

     

     

     

  • Damian McGrath
    Damian McGrath Member Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭

    Re Privacy Policy and Data Collection see...

    http://www.logos.com/about/privacy

     

    Not sure why they collect cookies....

  • J.R. Miller
    J.R. Miller Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭

    RussWhite said:

    As Logos goes down this road, it is committing everyone who uses this software to a specific worldview--a worldview many people would argue is not Christian (including me).

    Seriously, the use of the internet is not "Christian"?  But doing IT for a living is?  Are you for real?  I see why you are in IT and not a theologian.  Give me a break.  Next you will be telling us that "The Cloud" is really the 666 mark of the beast.  [6]

    My Books in Logos & FREE Training

  • John Fugh, Jr.
    John Fugh, Jr. Member Posts: 651 ✭✭

    I think we should not be to hasty with Russ.  I have been on the forum for a while and there are some real concerns that people have with the Cloud computing.  I know the L4 is not quite there, but Russ does point out that the trajectory that it throws us is quite clear.  I have worked in the IT field and worked in Information Security for a Credit Card company for many years.  For those who are ignorant about the threats that are out there seem to be blissfully living in another realm.  It is not safe.  I don't care if I only have notes or sermons on my computer - my information should be secure and what I purchase should not be dependent on the Internet.  I KNOW...this is not L4 - but, Russ makes a good point that it sure looks like this is the trajectory.

     

    John

  • Richard Stimson
    Richard Stimson Member Posts: 32 ✭✭

    I am not so worried about privacy but about not lossing my notes.  T-mobile just loss all the information they had in the "Cloud."  I guess the point of the cloud computing is to keep everything on the web, including the progroams, not just the notes and resources. 

  • J.R. Miller
    J.R. Miller Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭

    I agree that security is important, and pertaining to security, Russ offered some good suggestions in another post.  But John regarding the specific item I quoted,  do you agree with Russ that using the cloud is not "Christian" or do you need more time to think about that one?  

    My Books in Logos & FREE Training

  • John Fugh, Jr.
    John Fugh, Jr. Member Posts: 651 ✭✭

    I agree that security is important, and pertaining to security, Russ offered some good suggestions in another post.  But John regarding the specific item I quoted,  do you agree with Russ that using the cloud is not "Christian" or do you need more time to think about that one?  

     

    No, I don't agree with Russ.  I cannot see the soteriological connection between salvation and cloud computing.  ;)

     

  • Randall Hartman
    Randall Hartman Member Posts: 502 ✭✭

    Doesn't the Bible say something about a "great cloud of witnesses?" [:D]

    Sorry.  Couldn't resist.

  • Dave Hooton
    Dave Hooton MVP Posts: 35,767

    RussWhite said:

    1. Don't ever remove a book I own. IE, if I own it, and it's on my hard drive, make it so it can never be removed, that it's always possible to have local books which can be run locally, and not touched, or even possibly seen, by "the cloud."

    2. Explain what the deletion policy is once something has been "hidden." Is it really deleted? Or is it just on some backup someplace?

    Logos have stated they will not arbitrarily remove resources eg. deliberate (by user) or unintended deletion will result in a "missing" resource. Their design intent is no missing resources, so a replacement will be downloaded. 

    When you "hide" a resource it is deleted from the local Resources folder but the cloud knows not to provide a replacement until you unhide it. You can view all hidden resources in Program Settings. There is no reason to store it elsewhere on the local computer when it is always on their server!

    The remaining possibility is that the licence is altered so that I no longer own a resource(s). Logos have stated this is not likely to occur and this is an untested scenario ie. I don't know if the resource(s) would be removed after the new licence was downloaded, or what access I would have.

    Logos will provide an email backup of the licence on request, but I'm not sure how that can be used locally.

    If you want local books that cannot be seen and touched by the "cloud" then you have to run L3, where you can arbitrarily delete resources and use any licence that you backed up!

    RussWhite said:

    3. How much information is Logos drawing from my system?

    You can choose Anonymous or None in Program Settings. If similar to L3 it relates to usage patterns for features that affect future development. 

    RussWhite said:

    4. How much information can third party players gather from my use of Logos because it's on "the cloud?"

    I don't have an answer for that if you choose the (default) setting of All.   I use Anonymous, irrespective of any Privacy policy.

    Dave
    ===

    Windows 11 & Android 13

  • Bob Pritchett
    Bob Pritchett Member, Logos Employee Posts: 2,280

    Russ, 

    Thanks for bringing up these points. They're legitimate concerns, and I share many of them, particularly in regards to business and financial information.

    Some of the beta testers have already accurately given our position: we let you run offline, we are privately held with no intentions of selling, and your data is all stored locally. (In some ways it's "safer", because we use the cloud to sync your data to your machine; we don't store it exclusively in the cloud like some web sites. So the more machines you have, the more backups you have independent of our servers.)

    We do have a secure system. (Though not perfect -- nothing is.) I can say this with confidence because our volume of credit card transactions forces us to comply with PCI Security Standards (https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/), and we've audited our systems, conformed to their rules, etc. I'm wearing an employee photo ID right now as a result of their requirements. (So no one can pose as Logos employee, sneak in, and sit down at a terminal to steal your credit card number. Or sermon.)

    But even more importantly, this is Bible study, not banking. We took the decision to sync your content to the cloud very seriously, but in the end we decided that since the vast majority of our customers use our software to prepare sermons that they then aim to preach in public to as many people as they can get to show up at the church, it's not a life / career / finances destroying problem if we are ever hacked. (And we're probably not that interesting a target to hack! The only thing of value to an outsider is the credit card numbers, and, alas, pastors' credit card numbers don't have the larger limits they should!)

    I know there are people doing Bible study in closed countries, or taking notes regarding confidential counseling situations. We do take privacy seriously, and keep those things in mind. But if you're in a place where the fact you're doing Bible study is life threatening, you probably shouldn't use an Internet connected app like ours, whether it stores your notes in the cloud or not. And if there's something that confidential in your counseling notes, don't store those things in our software.

    (Also, don't store passwords or credit card numbers in Logos notes, or as tags on your books in the Library. :-) )

    Again, I'm not trying to trivialize the concern, but simply to illustrate that we thought of it, and that we aren't encouraging you to store anything we'd consider truly confidential within our system.

     

  • DominicM
    DominicM Member Posts: 2,995 ✭✭✭

    I am not so worried about privacy but about not lossing my notes.  T-mobile just loss all the information they had in the "Cloud."  I guess the point of the cloud computing is to keep everything on the web, including the progroams, not just the notes and resources. 

     

    Although L4 uses the cloud to seamlessly syncronise between machines, it is also kept local, if logos cloud failed we still have local copies of everything in the cloud.thing,

    No risk of losing anything, except we delete, and then the sync server (cloud) gets updated, L4 is not cloud in traditional sense

     

    Never Deprive Anyone of Hope.. It Might Be ALL They Have

  • Russ White
    Russ White Member Posts: 552 ✭✭

    Damian, thanks for the answers... Those were/are helpful. I hope Logos seriously looks into the problems with "the cloud" if they continue moving in this direction. The problem is always in the unintended consequences--they never smack you in the face like you might want them to.

    I know folks here think I'm a kook--I'm fine with that. I've been called worse, trust me. :-) In reply, I'll just quote John Loeffler  in a bit of a tongue in cheek joke--"your failure to be informed does not make me a whacko."

    For those who wonder about my moral stance, I think we all have to struggle with what we do for a living, and with what we buy, and who we buy from--I can seriously say I struggle with what I see going on, and from time to time, even with what I work on. I've even been known to take some unpopular positions in specific cases (imagine that!).

    Russ
    (for those who might be interested: http://www.riw.us)

  • Russ White
    Russ White Member Posts: 552 ✭✭

    Bob:

    Thanks for the answers--again, very helpful. What always concerns me, as I've said elsewhere, are the unintended consequences and the confluence of information. I live in the world of EEFIs, PCI, and all sorts of other nice acronyms, even if it's not my "primary" job. I especially feel for you on the PCI front. *sigh*

    Anyway, I'm not trying to be a wet noodle, just trying to ask questions, understand, and possibly offer up suggestions, or concerns. I'm not about to dump Logos, or dump my credit card info into Logo, either one.

    Thanks again.

    Russ

  • Damian McGrath
    Damian McGrath Member Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭

    RussWhite said:

    Damian, thanks for the answers... 

    Russ, you're welcome.

    Just as Bob took seriously your questions, so did I. They are legitimate concerns and deserve answers (see also Dave Hooton's reply above).

    Be assured, that in Beta testing, many questions were posed and many challenges thrown down and Bob responded graciously to them all. While I do not agree with all decisions that have been made (esp. the failure to implement each and every one of my 50 plus suggestions [:)]), Bob is more than capable of responding to any concerns you may have.

  • Jon
    Jon Member Posts: 767 ✭✭

    RussWhite said:

    As Logos goes down this road, it is committing everyone who uses this software to a specific worldview--a worldview many people would argue is not Christian (including me).

    I wouldn't pass judgement too quickly given your website's emphasis on weapons...