would it not be beneficial for Logos.com product descriptions to clearly indicate what base packages include that product? For instance, in a recent riveting discussion of L4 vs. [unnamed rival software], "HALOT" mentioned. I wondered if I had it (I didn't think I did, though I have Platinum--which includes BDAG which is sometimes bundled with HALOT). I searched Logos.com for it. I wanted to quickly know: would it be in Portfolio?
Of course I could go to the product comparison chart, and probably HALOT would be easy to find--assuming it is in a base package. But think of how many other books/products one might browse, think of purchasing, but then realize without much fuss that it is in a base package. And then realize that base package has other works you were browsing. It might make the decision to invest in an upgraded package much easier.
If he reads this, I am sure Phillip Spitzer (the "pointy one" . . . a loose paraphrase of the meaning of his surname in German) could produce a nice graphic showing how this might look on Logos.com . . .