Hate to say it, but slower than Logos 4 for me

I really hate to say it, since I really like Logos 5 as far as all the other aspects, but it is about 25% slower than Logos 4 was for me. I never had a big problem with Logos 4 from the beginning, though I know a lot of people complained about the speed. At the end, Logos 4 was positively snappy on my system. It seems that they changed something that made everybody else's faster and mine slower. Strange. What makes other's faster makes mine slower.

Another thing is it keeps crashing when I try to rearrange the prioritization list in my library. It crashes almost every time now.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Dave Hooton

Another thing is it keeps crashing when I try to rearrange the prioritization list in my library

We need to see some logs Read carefully and upload logos.log and logoserror.log

DivineCordial

Have you defragmented your hard drive since upgrading?

Erwin Stull, Sr.

I've noticed that L5 is a little bit slower on startup (for me), and a little bit faster within the program itself. For myself, the startup lag was expected due to older hardware.

William Gabriel

Out of curiosity, did upgrading make you come close to filling up your hard drive?

William Gabriel

And the reoccurring crashing makes it sound like something is wrong with the program. It wouldn't surprise me if that issue is also causing the sluggishness. If you submit your logs and get some help, or reinstall, then it wouldn't surprise me if you notice a turnaround in performance.

Kendall Sholtess

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/420428#Comment_420428

Hey, I have decided to do a clean install. It might take some time, but hopefully all the bugs will be worked out. Thanks for y'all's suggestions though. [:)]

JT (alabama24)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/420477#Comment_420477

Let us know how it goes. [:)]