Community Typo Repair & Hyperlink Creation/Repair

Page 2 of 2 (23 items) < Previous 1 2
This post has 22 Replies | 4 Followers

Posts 579
Andrew Baguley | Forum Activity | Replied: Sat, Jun 4 2011 4:23 AM

This sounds popular (on the whole).  Is it on User Voice yet?

Posts 2
hamburg113 | Forum Activity | Replied: Sat, Jun 11 2011 6:20 PM

thank you; If you want more information.

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

If you want to get more materials that related to this topic, you can visit: Employee review phrases


Best regards.

Posts 9947
George Somsel | Forum Activity | Replied: Sat, Jun 11 2011 6:30 PM


Jacob Hantla:
Typos: When a critical number (3?) users propose the exact same typo fix, it should automatically be accepted and the digital file updated. This could be done without human intervention on Logos' side, allowing product improvement without significant cost to Logos.

Not sure this is such a great idea as it first sounds. Just the other day someone was annoyed about a lot of moe's in his Bible. Turned out moe was a perfectly legitimate AV form for more. It doesn't matter how many people report that "typo", they're still wrong, and an automated "fix" is the last thing we need. We'd end up with 10 times more typos instead of a few less.

Absolutely correct.  The reported typo must be compared to the original to ensure that errors are not being introduced in the process.  Even if the correction is to a real error, the electronic edition should agree with the print.  The only way such errors should be corrected is if the publisher issues a corrected edition.


יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

Page 2 of 2 (23 items) < Previous 1 2 | RSS