Requesting reading plan generation improvements

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/915074#Comment_915074

Thanks for starting this thread!

For a moment, a brief moment, I thought I had found a solution in the courses tool. But no, that curated effort is far away from what is needed to set up dynamic, read at your own pace, reading plans.

As I understand it, FL has other goals in store for the Courses tool, including letting us create our own plans.

I believe the Courses tool is designed to be far more advanced than the reading plans that we are accustomed to, and that we will eventually be able to do a great deal more within that tool to create our own (book reading plan and other) content.

I would personally like to see your (dynamic, automatically generated) requests be rolled out in the newer Courses tool, rather than the older custom reading plan tool.

I agree that the date-based model doesn't match our real-world behavior of picking up a book and continuing to read it, as we find/make time. In that regard, I like how the Courses tool just lets us continue from where we left off, and then mark a "section" as complete.

If we could create and read our own Courses tool book reading plans on any platform, I think that would be ideal.

(If there are reasons why the Courses tool wouldn't be a good choice for reading books, I'd like to hear them too!)

Eduardo Espiritu

More than half of my needs can be satisfied if I could make a plan to read a resource a chapter per session. ( A drop down menu on the resource itself would be convenient. )

Another 30% of my needs can be met by options to change dates when behind or ahead, to save plans without start dates, and of course to plan subsets of the resource (only a few chapters).

Another option might be sections or pages instead of chapter per session.The ability to take an existing plan and change the start date would be nice, too. Can that be done already?

A UI for making a reading plan should be available from within the resource. For my uses selecting readig plan documents and then searching for the resource is awkward.

My uses of reading plan is for personal study; it is rare that I am coordinating a reading group.

Andrew116

The OP makes a LOT of sense to me.

a suggested implementation:

when a reading plan automatically divides up a book, get Logos to look for a natural break within 20% variance by page or word count. So readings will be slightly longer or shorter from day to day, but not too bad. At the worst, a 10 page per day plan would vary from 8 to 12 pages per day.

when it looks for a natural break, Logos should give preference to:

1. Chapter breaks. If this occurs in the variance range, automatically choose. If not:

2. Section / subheading break. If this occurs, auto choose. If not,

3. Paragraph break.

Jack Caviness

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/915074#Comment_915074

The ability to take an existing plan and change the start date would be nice, too. Can that be done already?

Tried that by creating a Reading Plan starting July 2, then clicked catch up to today (here). Had to close and reopen the plan for completed dates to show. Clicked Edit and changed the starting date to July 31 and back to July 17. Everything that had previously been marked complete was now cleared, and the plan said I was behind.

Tried this again with start date of July 17 and clicked catch up. Closed/reopened plan to see completed dates. Adjusted start date to July 20. All dates marked completed were now cleared.

Thus the answer to your question appears to be—You can change the start date, but you will lose any previous progress.

Another irritation on Reading Plans is the necessity to close and reopen in order to see completed dates.

Simon’s Brother

Books are what Logos Digital Library is about. But the current reading plan mechanisms are inadequate.

Thomas you have been requesting improvements in this area of the program for many years. Custom reading plans are FL's current solution but are too manual and hence take too long to set up.

I am in support of your ideas to improve usability in these area of the software.

Mike Binks

TC, your post is music to my ears and addresses my biggest frustration with Logos.

When I want to read a book for pleasure or general interest I want a plan that

I can assign a book to.
That will note how far I have got through it.
Will allow me to stop reading indefinitely but allow me to find the book when I want to know which ones I have started.
Will allow me to reject the book, delete the plan, and tag the book without cluttering up first level menus.

When I want to read a book for study I want a plan that

I can assign a book to.
Will allow me to divide the book into sensible, approximately equal, sections that finish at sensible points in the text.
(This implies a breaking point hierarchy - Chapters - Sub Sections - Paragraphs - Sentences all defined by a, perhaps user chosen, percentage variance limit on the regular reading length)
Will cater for the fact that I don't want to study on Weekends and during Holidays.
Integrates well with a note taking facility.

Custom reading plans take too much time to set up but I would not be adverse to an 'inspector' type panel which would allow these setting to be applied to the plan. Five minutes to set up a bespoke reading plan would be acceptable. Sensible defaults would make the plan instantaneous once you have selected a book.

I would have no objection to a software division 'Bible Reading Plans' and 'Book Reading Plans' in fact such a division might well be helpful.

What is sad is that we are so far down the Logos Now road and we have not seen any effort devoted to what must be a core use of Logos and which in my uneducated opinion must actually be the equivalent of low hanging fruit.

Thank you for the post TC!

I've had the exact same thoughts on the current reading plan set up!

In addition to what you've mentioned, I'd also appreciate:

1. The ability to generate a plan by paragraph. The current ability to generate a plan by pericope is great, but I find the pericopes in the NT are much smaller than the pericopes in the OT. The result is that my OT reading seems about 5 times longer than my NT reading. Perhaps this is appropriate because the OT is about 5 times longer than the New, but I'd appreciate some way of making the readings generally a similar amount of text. The page count method that TC mentioned would also work for this if it wasn't for the stopping mid sentence or mid paragraph.

2. The second thing I'd love to see would be some kind of a morning devotions tool. Possibly this would be it's own tool and not necessarily part of reading plans. I'd love something that would guide the reader through different books and tools as they saw fit each day. So if for morning devotions I wanted to go through my Bible reading plan for the day, and then a devotional, and then say, some scripture memorization, and lastly my prayer list, the tool would take me through each successively. It would be phenomenal if there was a tool that guided me through all of this.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/915218#Comment_915218

Granularity

So a Summary on Granularity spec for reading books that are not the Bible.

It sounds like we want increasing granularity focused on (in decreasing order):

Chapter level reading (default) Note that in books like DDD, I would consider each entry to be an individual chapter (e.g. the entry on Ananke would be a single reading ending just prior to Anat.)
Subheadings within chapters (There is room to determine whether or not we want all subheadings treated the same or not. Does Logos milestone differentiate between level two and level three, etc headings?)
Pages (e.g. always read two pages at a time.)
Paragraph. It has been requested, but that might be too small imho Nevertheless, it is a great idea to provide full flexibility if possible.

Further considerations for granularity in reading plans for non-bible books are:

Never, ever, break a reading in the middle of a paragraph or sentence.
Default to chapter breaks on all non-bible book readings.
Permit some form of interruption/resume capacity in my reading time. Let me right click a paragraph and somewhere in the many options already there provide an "Update reading plan to this stopping point" so I can pick it up again later right where I left off. (this is part of that dynamic reading plan concept).

Further considerations will be on PACE (read every day, adjusting dates, etc.)

Another consideration I would like to explore is a "reading stack" concept, so I can add a book to the end of an existing reading plan saying "read this book next: and link to the reading plan for it.

Matt Hamrick

I am grateful for the custom reading plans it does offer. I have no problem using that.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/916812#Comment_916812

It looks like we'll see some improvements in the near term, with the eventual merging of reading plans into the Courses tool.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/916804#Comment_916804

I like it!

Phil Gons (Logos)

Thanks for your feedback, TC and everyone else.

I had a good initial conversation with the desktop development team on this today. They're all excited to address many of these issues.

Here's what we're considering for an upcoming two-week sprint (which could perhaps make it into 7.10 or 7.11), pending a detailed technical review from the team:

Improve the Reference Range Picker for non-Bible reading plans so you can use non-Bible versified datatype reference ranges and, more importantly, the book's table of contents to select what portion of the book you'd like to read. Most likely people will uncheck things like Title Page, Dedication, Contents, Abbreviations, Acknowledges, Scripture Index, etc.
Add a new "at my own pace" frequency option to the current picker and probably make it the default (as least for non-Bibles). These plans wouldn't have a fixed start or end date, and the sessions wouldn't be attached to dates on a calendar.
Bring the session division control (the one that has Default, Chapter, Pericope) over from Bible reading plans and expose options like Chapter, Heading, Page (or perhaps, Level 1 TOC, Level 2 TOC, etc.). There may be a default algorithm that prefers chapter breaks, but might have some smarts to divide longer chapters (in intelligent places!) into multiple sessions and group shorter chapters into a single session. I need to think through this a little more. This feels like the most critical thing to get right.
Make the default for structure-based reading plans "in x sessions," where x is the number of units for the chosen division method (e.g., the number of chapters in the book).
Add a new "Start a reading plan" option to the context menu in the Library.
Add a new "Start a reading plan" option in the resource information pane in resources right after the place where we show "You've read x% of this book."

We'll work on some other improvements later, so please feel free to continue to share feedback and ideas, but this should be a good start to address the most critical issues.

As I mentioned in the other thread, longer term we'll likely merge Courses and Reading Plans and create a much more elegant plan builder inside the merged tool.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918033#Comment_918033

Here's what we're considering for an upcoming two-week sprint (which could perhaps make it into 7.10 or 7.11), pending a detailed technical review from the team:

Hi Phil

These sound really good - if you can get these done I think it will address a lot of issues.

And with support for chapters / ToC levels it should extend to Vyrso resources as well. Would you expect that to be the case?

Thanks, Graham

Joe Mayden

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918037#Comment_918037

Responsiveness is a tremendous indicator of customer care. This is an example of how much Logos cares for us and wants to enhance our ability to learn and to teach. This example of response is one of the reasons I don't mind paying a little more for Logos books, not only do the books have features that other software doesn't provide, datasets are amazing!, but we get engagement with developers like in this thread. Thanks Logos.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918037#Comment_918037

And with support for chapters / ToC levels it should extend to Vyrso resources as well. Would you expect that to be the case?

I hope so! I remember buying a calendar devotional from Vyrso, but couldn't conveniently use a reading plan for it because I would have had to customize each of the 365 days!

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918068#Comment_918068

I remember buying a calendar devotional from Vyrso, but couldn't conveniently use a reading plan for it because I would have had to customize each of the 365 days!

Less convinced it will handle that issue as there is some extra tagging needed for devotionals I believe - but am not sure of the details.

Phil Gons (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918069#Comment_918069

I remember buying a calendar devotional from Vyrso, but couldn't conveniently use a reading plan for it because I would have had to customize each of the 365 days!

Less convinced it will handle that issue as there is some extra tagging needed for devotionals I believe - but am not sure of the details.

We'll try to ensure Vyrso books benefit from this work as well.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918112#Comment_918112

Thanks Phil

James Hudson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918112#Comment_918112

I think repetition is important too...I'm not sure currently I can set up Logos Reading Plan to (for example):

1. Read a Psalm everyday forever (i.e. after 150 loop back to Ps 1)

2. Read Proverbs each day for a month (based on day of month)

3. Read a 'church of Revelation' each day of week (Sun->Sat) and then repeat (ad infinitum)

4. Read Jonathan Edwards resolutions daily

5. Read a pericope of the Gospels every day and continue looping through (so I always have a 'Gospel on the Go')

These are some 'real world examples' I have used or are currently trying to use or can't do in Logos. (Even setting up Jonathan Edwards resolutions for daily reading was a pain -I can't even remember how I managed it!)

Hope this can be incorporated in any Reading Plan update.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918112#Comment_918112

We'll try to ensure Vyrso books benefit from this work as well.

Thanks!

Mike Henry Sr.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918033#Comment_918033

We'll work on some other improvements later, so please feel free to continue to share feedback and ideas, but this should be a good start to address the most critical issues.

As I mentioned in the other thread, longer term we'll likely merge Courses and Reading Plans and create a much more elegant plan builder inside the merged tool.

When you're making changes to the reading plans, could you also look at the logic for how the days are broken up in the bible reading plans?

When I recently generated a reading plan for the Psalms broken on chapter and set it for 40 verses a day, I would expect a chapter break at or near 40 verses to be the end of each day. However there are several occasions where I get one day with a large number of verses followed by several days with very short verse counts.

Existing:

Day 1 - Ps 89, 90, 91 - 85 verses

Day 2 - Ps 92, 93 - 20 verses

Day 3 - Ps 94, 95, 34 total

Ideal

Day 1 - Ps 89, 52 verses

Day 2 - Ps 90, and 91, 92 (17, 16, and 15 verses, 48 total)

Day 3 - Ps 93, 94, and 95, (5, 23, 11, 39 total)

I don't understand how this works, but I use custom generated reading plans all the time and I am reminded of this every 4th or 5th day when I have a reading that is much longer than I'd expect followed by one that is much shorter. I expect problems when the chapters exceed 40 verses, but I can't figure out how this works so that I can get it to calculate things the way I'd like.

Or, if anyone can explain the logic to me, I'd appreciate knowing that too. Then maybe I can adapt to the existing logic and get my desired outcome. Thanks!

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918033#Comment_918033

Thanks for your feedback, TC and everyone else.

I had a good initial conversation with the desktop development team on this today. They're all excited to address many of these issues.

Between this and the other thread I'm walking on cloud nine wrt reading plans. Thank you Phil for posting this response.

Now if i can just get a "read this later" pile started in my Logos Library, I'll be a happy happy man... wrt reading lists.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918033#Comment_918033

Here's what we're considering for an upcoming two-week sprint (which could perhaps make it into 7.10 or 7.11), pending a detailed technical review from the team:

Hi Phil

Any update on the likelihood of this in the near future?

I'm planning to start reading some fairly long books soon and just thinking about how to best set up the reading plans.

Thanks, Graham

Mattillo

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918033#Comment_918033

Thanks for your feedback, TC and everyone else.

I had a good initial conversation with the desktop development team on this today. They're all excited to address many of these issues.

Here's what we're considering for an upcoming two-week sprint (which could perhaps make it into 7.10 or 7.11), pending a detailed technical review from the team:

Improve the Reference Range Picker for non-Bible reading plans so you can use non-Bible versified datatype reference ranges and, more importantly, the book's table of contents to select what portion of the book you'd like to read. Most likely people will uncheck things like Title Page, Dedication, Contents, Abbreviations, Acknowledges, Scripture Index, etc.

Add a new "at my own pace" frequency option to the current picker and probably make it the default (as least for non-Bibles). These plans wouldn't have a fixed start or end date, and the sessions wouldn't be attached to dates on a calendar.

Bring the session division control (the one that has Default, Chapter, Pericope) over from Bible reading plans and expose options like Chapter, Heading, Page (or perhaps, Level 1 TOC, Level 2 TOC, etc.). There may be a default algorithm that prefers chapter breaks, but might have some smarts to divide longer chapters (in intelligent places!) into multiple sessions and group shorter chapters into a single session. I need to think through this a little more. This feels like the most critical thing to get right.

Make the default for structure-based reading plans "in x sessions," where x is the number of units for the chosen division method (e.g., the number of chapters in the book).

Add a new "Start a reading plan" option to the context menu in the Library.

Add a new "Start a reading plan" option in the resource information pane in resources right after the place where we show "You've read x% of this book."

We'll work on some other improvements later, so please feel free to continue to share feedback and ideas, but this should be a good start to address the most critical issues.

As I mentioned in the other thread, longer term we'll likely merge Courses and Reading Plans and create a much more elegant plan builder inside the merged tool.

Thank you Phil. I hope these improvements come soon! I was trying to create a reading plan by chapters for Heiser's new book and gave up.

One other suggestion. Add create reading plans to mobile and web app

chacojerald

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918033#Comment_918033

Hi, so glad these items are being addressed: They will make the Reading Plan useful for chapter books! I looked into the free book of the month on the Psalms, and found it so interesting I wanted to read a Psalm a day with the commentary. But the Reading Plan app can't give me a chapter (ie. Psalm & commentary) a day! And so I came to the forum and found kindred spirits! Just wondering on the progress? 7.11 SR-1

Mike Henry Sr.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/918033#Comment_918033

Here's what we're considering for an upcoming two-week sprint (which could perhaps make it into 7.10 or 7.11), pending a detailed technical review from the team:

@Phil, did this idea die? Any chance we'll see an update to reading plans any time soon? I continue to see the problems I've experienced with inconsistent daily selection length.

Willy Arnold

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/963984#Comment_963984

Yeah, what mike said. What happened to this? I am especially interested in the "read at your own pace" option.

On a related side note, it would also be nice to click on that little "You have read __ % of this book" circle and get more detailed information about what chapters / sections we actually have read. )

Thanks!

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/963984#Comment_963984

Phil, are there improvements coming to Reading Plans?

Phil Gons (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/972529#Comment_972529

Phil, are there improvements coming to Reading Plans?

We initially thought there were some quick-win opportunities with reading plans. It turned out that everything we were exploring was significantly harder than we originally though. So, unfortunately, we had to table this work for later. We'd still love to come back to it, but it's not under active development at the moment. I'm sorry we haven't been able to make these improvements yet.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/972551#Comment_972551

We initially thought there were some quick-win opportunities with reading plans. It turned out that everything we were exploring was significantly harder than we originally though. So, unfortunately, we had to table this work for later. We'd still love to come back to it, but it's not under active development at the moment.

That's fair.

Reuben Helmuth

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/972551#Comment_972551

We'd still love to come back to it

Thanks for the update, Phil! Are you still thinking a reading plan/course tool merger for the long term?

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/972551#Comment_972551

Phil, are there improvements coming to Reading Plans?

We initially thought there were some quick-win opportunities with reading plans. It turned out that everything we were exploring was significantly harder than we originally though. So, unfortunately, we had to table this work for later. We'd still love to come back to it, but it's not under active development at the moment. I'm sorry we haven't been able to make these improvements yet.

Hey Phil! We'd love to hear if there is any continuing progress on this one. Thank you and the Logos team for your work in this direction!

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/972551#Comment_972551

We initially thought there were some quick-win opportunities with reading plans. It turned out that everything we were exploring was significantly harder than we originally though

As one who built a couple of the Course "reading plans" - blame me for The Bible Timeline Guide Journal, The 16 Documents of Vatican II .. . I was choosing courses that served the liturgical churches, deliberately selecting a Lutheran Book of Concord reading plan. Why did I think it was a useful case? (a) it has it's own well known reference system (b) there are multiple translations available in Logos (c) the translations differ a bit in format. You can blame me for the lack of such a reading plan in the released Courses as I could find erroneous behavior in each attempt. No, I didn't intentionally jinx the system, I have,in fact, recently requested permission to build the data for some Verbum resources that I think should function well. But I did convince myself that something as "simple" as a common reading plan for a foundation document (Book of Concord) is actually surprisingly difficult.

Kevin A

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/989482#Comment_989482

Bumping to bring all these suggestions for improvments back to discussions.

Hopefully this has not been shelved completely, and there are there still plans to implement some new tools, or upgrade the current ones.

Having the ability to create shareable modifiable book reading plans/courses, I think would be very beneficial to the community.

Has anyone seen any other updates about this ?

Thanks

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/972551#Comment_972551

We initially thought there were some quick-win opportunities with reading plans. It turned out that everything we were exploring was significantly harder than we originally though. So, unfortunately, we had to table this work for later. We'd still love to come back to it, but it's not under active development at the moment. I'm sorry we haven't been able to make these improvements yet.

Is it later yet?

I feel like I am still constantly fighting against reading plans to make them flow well. Section breaks are nearly always just plain wrong. Custom reading plans take a ridiculous amount of time and frustration to properly set up.

Three years later.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1103660#Comment_1103660

I would give up nearly any of the new features and books of the past 3 years if I could get better reading plan functionality...

Mike Binks

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1104279#Comment_1104279

Oh Liam - just how much I agree with you.

How can a firm that makes it's money selling books ignore the basic tools to allow for reading them?

It beggars belief!

Jack Caviness

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1104373#Comment_1104373

How can a firm that makes it's money selling books ignore the basic tools to allow for reading them?

Well said!