How complete is Intertext labeling?

Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
This post has 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 1244
Mike Tourangeau | Forum Activity | Posted: Thu, Mar 15 2018 10:24 AM

I am not sure if I am straining at a gnat here but shouldn't Mark 11:7-8 have a Label for allusion or echo of Zech 9:9-10?

Matthew and Luke do.....maybe Mark's is too vague (?) 

Posts 1301
LogosEmployee
Rick Brannan (Faithlife) | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Mar 15 2018 11:04 AM

I think "complete" is an impossible state, especially with echoes and loose allusions.

But I'll slate this pair for review. Thanks for mentioning it!

Rick Brannan
Data Wrangler, Faithlife
My books in print

Posts 1301
LogosEmployee
Rick Brannan (Faithlife) | Forum Activity | Replied: Fri, Mar 16 2018 11:01 AM

Hi Mike.

I'll update the internal data to add an allusion between Mark 11:7 and Zechariah 9:9. An update should be available on April 2 (I've missed the internal cut-off for the March 19 resource update).

Rick Brannan
Data Wrangler, Faithlife
My books in print

Posts 1301
LogosEmployee
Rick Brannan (Faithlife) | Forum Activity | Replied: Fri, Mar 16 2018 11:05 AM

Mike Tourangeau:
Matthew and Luke do.....maybe Mark's is too vague (?)

Matthew 21:5 and John 12:5 both explicitly cite the Zechariah passage. Mark's is much more loose, but annotating as an allusion makes sense.

You mention Luke, I'm guessing Luke 19:35–36. That is not presently annotated, but I will add an allusion to Zech 9:9 there too.

Rick Brannan
Data Wrangler, Faithlife
My books in print

Posts 1244
Mike Tourangeau | Forum Activity | Replied: Sat, Mar 17 2018 10:05 AM

Thanks Rick! I imagine chasing all the allusions is a bit of a "rabbit hole" Powerful tagging to the apostolic fathers though. I am really enjoying the functionality

Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS