KYLE: Missing KJV equivalent resources

Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Posts 30150
Forum MVP
MJ. Smith | Forum Activity | Posted: Thu, Oct 22 2020 7:58 PM

There are at least four sets of equivalent resources implemented:

Group 1:

  • The Holy Bible: King James Version. 2009. Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
  • Zodhiates, Spiros, and Warren Baker. 2000. The Complete Word Study Bible: King James Version. electronic ed. Chattanooga: AMG Publishers.
  • The Holy Bible: King James Version. 1995. electronic ed. of the 1769 edition of the 1611 Authorized Version. Bellingham WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
  • I would expect The Cambridge Paragraph Bible: Of the Authorized English Version. 1873. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. To also be included

Why isn't the paragraph version included as an equivalent resource when the 1769 and 1900 versions are both in the group?

Orthodox Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."

Posts 30150
Forum MVP
MJ. Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Sat, Oct 31 2020 5:04 PM

bump 4

Orthodox Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."

Posts 26017
Forum MVP
Dave Hooton | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Nov 2 2020 3:47 PM

The Word Study Bible has American spelling in places e.g. honor vs. honour

The New Cambridge Paragraph Bible and The Cambridge Paragraph Bible differ slightly, and  differ from the other three only over olde English terms e.g. spake vs. spoke; my (NCPB) vs. mine; thy (NCPB) vs. thine (but they all hang onto speaketh, seeketh, judgeth). But they are essentially equivalent.

Dave
===

Windows 10 & Android 8

Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS