I was quite surprised, and I am ~very~ pleased, to note that Logos just updated the Oxford Bible Commentary in my Logos4 installation, and that a new resource with the file name of "oxbibcom.logos4" now resides on my hard drive. Furthermore, within Logos4, the resource now is detected as a "Commentary" (and not as a "Monograph"). I am very impressed that Logos would take the time to update this old Logos2 (I think) resource.
Thank you very much, Logos.
Fred
I had not noticed, glad you pointed it out. Thanks for doing so. I, too, am impressed that they would update it.
Help*Wiki*FAQ*User Voice*Our Ideas*CP
Fred:I was quite surprised, and I am ~very~ pleased, to note that Logos just updated the Oxford Bible Commentary in my Logos4 installation
Can you provide a link to the product page for this resource on the Logos web site? I couldn't find a resource with the specific phrase "Oxford Bible Commentary" in the title.
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Hale:Can you provide a link to the product page for this resource on the Logos web site? I couldn't find a resource with the specific phrase "Oxford Bible Commentary" in the title.
It hasn't been sold for a long time.
Mac Mini late 2010 8GB RAM 10.6.8
For those not familiar, Oxford, in terms of its 'flavor', would likely be the small version of Interpreters. Although it puts what some might call 'liberal' data on the table, it doesn't go wild. Personally I think it's a little more stable than Word, less liberal than Hermeneia, but not as in-depth as New Jerome (as a 1-volume).
I have all three 1-volumes (Interpreters (older), Jerome, and Oxford). Of the three, New Jerome is head and shoulders above the other two (again as a 1-volume).
I know this thread is 'Oxford' but I doubt that's do-able given the publisher. New Jerome along with the updated Interpreters currently on pre-pub would REALLY be a good addition to Logos.
This is obviously just opinion, but New Jerome handles a lot of the archaeological and manuscript data with considerably more finesse than some of the recent evangelical entries (both conservative).
fgh: Donnie Hale:Can you provide a link to the product page for this resource on the Logos web site? I couldn't find a resource with the specific phrase "Oxford Bible Commentary" in the title. It hasn't been sold for a long time.
DMB: For those not familiar, Oxford, in terms of its 'flavor', would likely be the small version of Interpreters. Although it puts what some might call 'liberal' data on the table, it doesn't go wild. Personally I think it's a little more stable than Word, less liberal than Hermeneia, but not as in-depth as New Jerome (as a 1-volume). I have all three 1-volumes (Interpreters (older), Jerome, and Oxford). Of the three, New Jerome is head and shoulders above the other two (again as a 1-volume). I know this thread is 'Oxford' but I doubt that's do-able given the publisher. New Jerome along with the updated Interpreters currently on pre-pub would REALLY be a good addition to Logos. This is obviously just opinion, but New Jerome handles a lot of the archaeological and manuscript data with considerably more finesse than some of the recent evangelical entries (both conservative).