-
I get the same - expect a quick solution when Bellingham get into to work. Still early days - probably an automated overnight routine that didn't do the whole job. Shalom
-
Good news - hopefully going forward we can also get more updates and additions Shalom
-
Enjoy https://www.logos.com/library-expansions Shalom Kevin
-
For other in the Pentecostal Commentary series - see https://www.bestcommentaries.com/series/pentecostal-commentary-pc/ shalom
-
Hi Are we any nearer to this tagging functionality being available.?? Shalom
-
Okay how do I PM (Private Message) here - not done that before. Shalom
-
On what basis do you say it is "badly erroneous" Shalom
-
Hi Cynthia Interesting question - and I was tempted to answer initially in a way that would fit with the question. However being a bit of an "agent provocateur" I found myself thinking a bit "out of the box". Please bear with me. What got me thinking was something I read way back that posed the following question. "If church history was written as if
-
Hi Faithlife and Phil First thank you for the work in getting some of the journals (and newer issues) out earlier. My questions are 'first' regarding the progression of the plans to get the next tranche out - and 'second' how is the intention to add crowd source mark-up coming along? Shalom
-
They do under https://www.logos.com/products/search?Product+Type=Logos+Mobile+Education&start=180&sort=pricelo&pageSize=60 but appear part way down - must been in 'prep' for sometime - maybe! Shalom
-
Two reasons - in my view Becoming ready to write a top line commentary is a lifetimes enterprise. Specifically the research needed is increasingly extensive and very very time consuming! Next the investment mentioned above and in the financial and editorial side of the publication are enormous. There may be other reasons, but just these make the business
-
Very droll
-
[quote user="Dale E Heath"] Best Commentaries shows that R. Glenn Wooden will be the author of Daniel. Block is the author of both Ezekiel volumes. [/quote] Wooden has been assigned by Eerdmans as the contracted author for the Daniel volume(s) - however there is little beyond that. There is certainly no publication date - also no chatter from the author
-
On previous major releases it was a few months after the release that the early discounts went and the basic software only became available to all (i.e. free). Have I missed this happening or is this still to come. I notice the basic version 8 is free. Is that the 'same' thing? Shalom.
-
[quote user="Michael S."] Works Cited. What good is it if when I copy and paste from a resource, the works citation is not correctly formatted? It even lets you pick the format (Turabian, Chicago, etc..), why if it is not correctly formatted? [/quote] An absolute must - currently very inconsistent. Shalom
-
So where does Israelology Fit in this scheme? Shalom
-
[quote user="Phil Gons (Faithlife)"] There were six new volumes added that came in since we posted the collection. Mark's list is correct. We decided to include them rather than waiting until the next version, which we figured you'd appreciate. :) [/quote] I have high confidence that you are correct! I for one will appreciate all I can get! Shalom
-
[quote user="Phil Gons (Faithlife)"] Another possibility is that we'll provide better tooling to crowd-source this tagging. I have something I'd like to prototype with some folks in the next month or so. [/quote] I am sure that will get a lot of support - we will need to keep an eye on quality control - but I am also sure that is something that can
-
[quote user="John Fidel"] I have been investing in journals for many years, so the entry price was not so great. I suggest FL consider selling the more recent years in a separate package and/or offer the earlier years at a discount to allow for entry of more customers. [/quote] Won't affect me as I already have the latest available MJB - however this
-
I agree totally here with what Joseph Turner has said - I believe this is a real issue for many potential customers. they see the system as broken - so are unwilling to invest in it. However I totally see the Faithlife concern that it "has" to be financially viable. Somehow the impasse need to be dealt with or we will remain in this situation. If we