Search

Search in sorted by
  • Re: Historical Present Inconsistency

    I ran a search and found the 9 places where the tagging was inconsistent. There were 4 instances where the tag was missing in SBLGNT, so those places have been corrected. The other instances were cases where the base text used for the LDGNT differs from the SBLGNT. For example, in John 21:17 the LDGNT has 3 Historical Presents all of which are λεγει
    Posted to Logos Now by Jimmy Parks on Mon, Apr 13 2015
  • Re: Speechless!

    Yes. Propositional Markers 5. Reported Speech
    Posted to Logos 6 by Jimmy Parks on Tue, Feb 10 2015
  • Re: Bug in clause search: to feel (emotion) not available

    I get results with this search.
    Posted to Logos Desktop Beta by Jimmy Parks on Thu, Jul 5 2018
  • Re: Parsing error in Lexham Hebrew Bible?

    Rick is right on the money. As you noted, Michel, the form is annotated correctly. This word, though it is feminine in the singular, takes a morphologically masculine ending in the plural. For a more detailed discussion see Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar §24.2. Van Der Merwe mentions this case explicitly in §24.2.(iv).c.
    Posted to General by Jimmy Parks on Tue, Sep 25 2018
  • Re: Classification of semantic role in Mark 3:33

    This is an excelent question, and it deals with some differences in the analysis done by Danove and that done by us. Danove states, about ειμι: "Within the method of analysis, this verb is distinct from other verbs in that it is deemed to have no autonomous existence and, of itself, to require no arguments. Instead its function is to extend verbal status
    Posted to Logos 6 by Jimmy Parks on Mon, Aug 31 2015
  • Re: New Feature: Addressees in Reported Speech (Dataset)

    This was not tagged by mistake. This is a case of an embedded speech. God is speaking to Moses and Aaron starting in 12:1-20, but in 12:3 God tells Moses and Aaron that they are to speak to the congregation of Israel. The mistake was stopping the speech of Moses and Aaron at 12:6. It continues all the way through 12:20. So, the speech event where Moses
    Posted to Logos Now by Jimmy Parks on Thu, Oct 15 2015
  • Re: Question on logic of assignment of addresee of prophecies

    The purpose of the label "audience of scripture" was to fit the broad usage of OT quotation found in the NT. None of the authors are consistent in their introduction of quotations, or their attribution of them. We can look at Matt 2:15 to see some of the problems that come up when trying to annotate the OT quotations. The people who will read this quotation
    Posted to Logos 6 by Jimmy Parks on Mon, Nov 9 2015
  • Re: New Feature: Hebrew Grammatical Constructions

    The documentation is being updated with the new search strings. Somewhere between creating the initial documentation and implementing the data into the software the search strings were updated, and I didn't realize it. In the time between now and the update to the documentation the new search strings can be found here: Verbless Clause: gramcon.vblscl
    Posted to Logos 7 by Jimmy Parks on Fri, Feb 10 2017
  • Re: Figures of Spech Dataset

    The search doesn't work for Bullinger's book. It searches the bible for the annotations that Bullinger has created. If you want to search within the Bullinger resource then you will be limited to keyword search with ctrl + f in the resource window.
    Posted to Logos 7 by Jimmy Parks on Tue, Apr 25 2017
  • Re: CUV with RI Speaker and Addressee Label Messed up

    What do these lists of numbers refer to? The ESV has: 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 25, 11 The CUV has: 15, 16, 17, 22, 21, 23, 24, 26, 25, 18, 19, 20, 11, 12, 13, 14 Are they verses?
    Posted to 中文 (Chinese) by Jimmy Parks on Mon, Apr 10 2017
  • Re: Figures of Spech Dataset

    That label is not an annotation on Bullinger's book. It was created to find data that has been annotated on the biblical text. The label only exists as a data point on bible resources. If you want to search the Bullinger resource, you will need to search for the headings that are used in the resource. You could use the concordance tool to create an
    Posted to Logos 7 by Jimmy Parks on Tue, Apr 25 2017
  • Re: Attn Kyle: Person tagging at Rev 11:1

    Thanks Dave. I've made the appropriate changes.
    Posted to Logos 8 by Jimmy Parks on Thu, Jul 16 2020
  • Re: Figures of Speech tags question and suggestion

    Maybe this isn't spelled out clearly enough in the documentation, but the classification used in the Figurative Language data set is not derived from literary/poetic theory. It is based on linguistics, and the cognitive mechanisms that are a part of language. Here is the definition for Metonymy from the Lexham Figurative Language of the Bible Glossary
    Posted to Logos Desktop Beta by Jimmy Parks on Mon, Sep 28 2020
  • Re: Figures of Speech tags question and suggestion

    The examples from Ephesians 6:19 We tag the phrase ἀνοίξει τοῦ στόματός as a metonymy since it is the more concrete action that accompanies producing speech standing in for the more abstract concept of speaking. We tag εὐαγγελίου
    Posted to Logos Desktop Beta by Jimmy Parks on Thu, Sep 24 2020
  • Re: Logos 9 Initial Impressions

    The Greek Grammar Ontology is an independent resource. Many of the concepts in the Ontology can be navigated to through Factbook. But mostly, it is a manual reference.
    Posted to Logos 9 Desktop App by Jimmy Parks on Tue, Nov 24 2020
  • Re: Attn Faithlife: Tagging Inconsistencies in Daniel

    As far as I can tell, the current annotation of these referents fits with others readings . The "kings of Persia" are entities who Daniel was left with, seemingly people who are actual rulers of the area. And the "prince of Greece" is also annotated as an angel because the term (שַׂ֣ר) prince is commonly used to refer to angelic beings. In v 21, Michael
    Posted to Logos 8 by Jimmy Parks on Wed, Aug 12 2020
  • Re: Errors in Lexham Hebrew Bible (LHB)

    In the list of words there are several things going on. ( אבק ) is listed as sense 2 probably because it is the second sense listed in HALOT, but sense 1 doesn't occur in the biblical text so we don't have one, which is confusing. This is also the case for ( אבר ) the first sense listed in HALOT doesn’t occur in a biblical text, but the second
    Posted to General by Jimmy Parks on Thu, Apr 16 2020
  • Re: BUG or not?

    Your right. I didn't look at the agent tagging. I added this tag, and it should show up after the next update cycle.
    Posted to Logos 8 by Jimmy Parks on Wed, Jan 15 2020
  • Re: Errors in Lexham Hebrew Bible (LHB)

    As far as I understand what you're asking, I think the issue has to do with the way our data is structured. Lexicons and other resources suggest homographs, but unless a particular word actually occurs within one of our tagged texts, it will not be searchable. Are there instances where one of these homographs occurs within a bible text that doesn't
    Posted to General by Jimmy Parks on Tue, Apr 14 2020
  • Re: Clause search for a person versus Bible search for a person

    Yes. MJ is right. Clause Search is limited in the results that it will return. Only Arguments of the main verb will be returned as results in a Clause Search query. So, your examples with Moses in the dative case are instances where the main verb takes a third argument in the dative case (typically this will be an indirect object). The examples with
    Posted to Logos 8 by Jimmy Parks on Mon, Jul 6 2020
Page 1 of 3 (41 items) 1 2 3 Next > |