-
For years I have used the "A" key on my keyboard as a shortcut to highlight whatever text I have selected in the book I am reading. At some point this started adding empty notes to one of my notebooks. I now have hundreds of of empty notes in that notebook linked to every highlight in every book I have read recently. This is not something I intended
-
[quote user="Adam Borries (Faithlife)"] I did some light testing, and confirmed that if a note is anchored to a book, it appears at the beginning of every chapter/article. I'll have the team take a look. [/quote] Thank you! [quote user="Adam Borries (Faithlife)"] [quote user="David Sloan"] the problem started showing up in Logos 7 as soon as Logos 8
-
[quote user="David Taylor Jr"] If you have a notebook open, and right click a passage and click "Add Note" it adds it to the appropriate notebook. [/quote] It appears to me that it makes the note, but not in my notebook. (How would it even know which notebook I want something in?) I have different notebooks on different topics. So, for example, I am
-
So far, this problem has not been resolved, and I am finding the new notes system to be rather frustrating. I want to go back to Logos 7! Even creating new notes is more difficult. I used to be able to add a note to a notebook simply by having that notebook open and right-clicking on a verse and choosing "Add a Note to [notebook name]." Now I have to
-
Yes, it was checked, but when I unchecked it, nothing changed. I should mention that it varies how many copies I see. So in the NRSV John 1 has 7 notes at the end of the text and then on the next line, at the beginning of John 2 (with only whitespace between those notes and these), there are the same 7 notes repeated, plus the two notes that I have
-
I have a lot of notes across many notebooks, with many of them tagged to specific Bible verses. Now for some reason I am seeing tons of copies of the notes. For example, I have seven different notes tagged to the Gospel of John as a whole (one on authorship, one on date, one on provenance, and so forth). Now if I open to the Gospel of John, I see those
-
The dates have proven to be quite problematic for me. When writing articles or book chapters I find myself going back and correcting dates in my footnotes for all of the commentaries I've cited. The Anchor Yale Bible is particularly frustrating. The publication date is typically given as 2008, and if you look at the book info it will give a copyright
-
New versions of Logos used to be released in November, on time for everyone to do their Christmas shopping (and on time for theological society meetings). Logos 7 was the first version to be released in August, on time for the new school year. It surprised me because I was expecting the release in November 2016 and it came early. It appears now that
-
I recently picked up the Ancient Literature Collection (30 vols.) . Many of the volumes I had already owned, but I bought it for the Hebrew and Canaanite Inscriptions and for the Aramaic Inscriptions, and I expected that I would start seeing these show up in the Textual Searches section of Word Studies and in the Ancient Literature section of the Passage
-
[quote user="doc"] The full set is currently in Verbum Portfolio, Standard Portfolio and Collector’s Edition. [/quote] I forgot that this is in Logos 7. Portfolio was out of my price range. But maybe that makes it less likely that it will be in Logos 8!
-
What do you think are the chances they include the set with Logos 8 Platinum or Diamond? I want to buy a number of the volumes, but I wonder if this set in particular is on sale because it is about to be bundled into a new base package, and I'd rather not buy it now and then find it it would have been included with something I will be buying soon.
-
Goodacre's work spawned many subsequent works arguing for the Farrer Hypothesis, and should definitely be in Logos. I would also like to see Goodacre and Perrin's Questioning Q and Poirier and Peterson's Marcan Priority without Q in Logos. I doubt that these works will dismount the two-document hypothesis as the majority view, but everyone should have
-
I am on the fence regarding whether or not to buy a library with this release. I put Logos 7 Platinum in my cart and noticed that it put two items in my cart: the full feature set and the platinum library. Since I am being indecisive, I thought I could at least purchase the full feature set now and decide on the library later, but when I moved the library
-
Disciple of Christ, you've had bad experiences with communication from Faithlife? My experience has only been good, but this retirement is disappointing. I wonder if we call Sales (when they're less busy) if they could pull the 6 base package out of retirement for us. Based on my experience I think they'll be more accommodating than you expect.
-
After having problems with the website all day, it is nice to be able to look at individual Logos 7 base packages now, but if I try to compare libraries it bounces me away from that page to logos.com/7, which will not show me the differences between Gold and Platinum and so forth. Will https://www.logos.com/compare/Standard work soon?
-
[quote user="Russel Taylor"] This is disappointing. I was hoping to upgrade to Platinum eventually. [/quote] Me too. My plan was to wait until Logos 7 came out and then get the Orthodox Platinum, but now there are no Orthodox base packages at all.
-
Could we get a spreadsheet posted on the forum with a list of resources in each base package? That would help tremendously while we cannot navigate all of the other pages on the website.
-
When I go to compare base packages I do not see an Orthodox base package. Is this coming in the future?
-
[quote user="Mark Barnes"] I was rather astonished to see no-one has suggested the Expository Times as a suitable Logos resource. There are literally thousands of references to ExpTim in Logos (8,234 in my resources). Persuading Sage to allow publication at a reasonable cost may be tricky, though. [/quote]
-
I have required this book for some of my courses. It is the simplest introduction to the New Perspective that I have read. Yinger attempts to be fair to both sides of the debate (though he does not do as good of a job representing the objections to the New Perspective as I would like). In the Romans course I am currently teaching, I am requiring this