Search

Search in sorted by
  • Re: Compare Bronze packages

    Thank you to all who replied to me! I just didn't scroll down far enough on the page. As you say, there is a selector box that shows me what's new with the upgrade. Got it!
    Posted to Logos 7 by Mark Lautenschlager on Fri, Aug 26 2016
  • Compare Bronze packages

    I presently own Logos 6 Reformed Bronze (plus I've unlocked some other specific books here and there). As I understand it, these are my upgrade options: 1. Buy Logos 7 feature set, for $211 and change. 2. Buy a Logos Now subscription, $99 a year. I understand how that all works. And if I choose either, I can continue to use the library I have right
    Posted to Logos 7 by Mark Lautenschlager on Fri, Aug 26 2016
  • Reasonable expectations for "development?"

    I ordered the pre-pub for the 2015 Reformation Study Bible notes and it's been "under development" for more than two months now. What is a reasonable time period to expect something to be under development? (Other electronic bible study apps have been able to get the 2015 RSB out the door already. *nudge*)
    Posted to Reformed Products by Mark Lautenschlager on Sat, Aug 15 2015
  • Alias icon on Mac OS dock?

    I'm running Mac OS X 10.10.3 on a current generation MacBook Pro with Retina display. Today, Logos 6 download 5+ GB of updates and something odd occurred. When I put the Logos 6 app icon on the dock and launch it for the first time, it quickly replaces it with an alias icon (the one with the little arrow in the bottom left hand corner). Now it isn't
    Posted to Logos 6 by Mark Lautenschlager on Tue, Jun 16 2015
  • Re: Hebrew verse numbers

    Can you verify if the problem exists in the current version of that database: BHW 4.18, and if so, what platform you are on and the version number of your copy of Logos and your copy of the BHW 4.18? Thanks!
    Posted to Jewish Products by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Mar 11 2015
  • Re: BUG searching Hebrew/Greek Lemma/Roots from the search window

    LHB is the only Hebrew Bible we have that currently has root data. (BHt will have its own root analysis). I haven't really tested the drop down word selector in the Bible Search UI. In the Morph Search tab, it's supposed to only show options that actually occur in the Bible(s) you select for searching, but there's some extra material showing up in that
    Posted to Logos 6 by Vincent Setterholm on Thu, Mar 5 2015
  • Re: QSM on Desktop still isn't right

    [quote user="Brian W. Davidson"] I am on a Mac. I haven't changes my default resource font from Default. [/quote] OK. There's probably some font-substitution code that is behaving differently on Mac vs. Windows. I'll put in a ticket to Dev on this, and I'll also see if the SBL font designer is willing to add the white brackets to the font the next time
    Posted to Logos 6 by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Feb 18 2015
  • Re: QSM on Desktop still isn't right

    [quote user="Brian W. Davidson"] Vincent, I know this is minute, but technically there shouldn't be a space between the double brackets and the single brackets in 2+1:5, correct? [/quote] There's no extra space there, actually. It's that the glyphs for those square brackets in this font have really wide margins.
    Posted to Logos 6 by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Feb 18 2015
  • Re: QSM on Desktop still isn't right

    The brackets display fine for me with SBL Hebrew: So I'm wondering a few things. 1) Are you on a Mac? And 2) Have you changed your 'default resource font' from 'Default' to something else? 3) What version number of Logos are you running and what is the support info for the version of QSM?
    Posted to Logos 6 by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Feb 18 2015
  • Re: why does ICC (Genesis) have extra white space coloumn?

    This layout was done by design. Of course, it must be going on a decade ago, so it's an older design. Tables worked a little differently in our software when this was made. But the reason Genesis was done this way was that the verse-by-verse sections of the print had a split between less-technical commentary on the top of the page and more technical
    Posted to Logos 5 by Vincent Setterholm on Mon, Feb 2 2015
  • Re: The most important Hebrew feature Faithlife (Lexham) could ever have

    Thanks for the suggestion, David. I think these kinds of editions are interesting. I've consulted them on occasion - when I'm unsure of where the accent falls on a word with a post-positive or a pre-positive accent (where the position of the accent doesn't necessarily tell you the normal stress syllable) or to find out what a metheg is doing (metheg
    Posted to Suggestions by Vincent Setterholm on Sat, Jan 31 2015
  • Re: Bug:אֱלוֹהַּ and Morphology chart

    Yes, there is one or more bugs going on here. At least one, I am told, has been addressed in internal builds (to do with unnecessary conversions between lemma data type references that causes some significant loss of hits). But there may be another issue with K/Q pairs not being handled well (note how this result is showing the K surface form, but the
    Posted to Logos 6 by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Dec 17 2014
  • Re: Ugaritic Ba'al cycle and the Psalms

    Dahood's 3-volume set on Psalms in the Anchor Bible has a lot of references to Ugaritic literature. https://www.logos.com/product/41424/psalms-i-1-50 https://www.logos.com/product/41425/psalms-ii-51-100 https://www.logos.com/product/41426/the-anchor-yale-bible-psalms-iii-101-150
    Posted to Logos 6 by Vincent Setterholm on Thu, Nov 6 2014
  • Re: Morphology changes??

    The Andersen-Forbes database is a fantastic resource, and you can still run all the same searches, visual filters, etc. directly on the Andersen-Forbes Analyzed Text. There were a number of reasons why we decided to make our own in-house Hebrew Bible (LHB). One of the most important benefits was to be in control of how the text is broken into segments
    Posted to Logos 6 by Vincent Setterholm on Thu, Oct 30 2014
  • Re: Searching for constructions where verb / participle use the same lemma within a sentence, clause, or phrase

    Sure, so you can assign any morph criteria you want (presuming the database you are searching tags that feature). If you don't care about the order of terms, just throw them in an unordered group. Assuming 'conjugated' here means 'finite', I'll exclude participles and infinitives from Word2, but you can tweak this to fit what you're looking for. Here
    Posted to Logos 5 by Vincent Setterholm on Fri, Oct 24 2014
  • Re: Searching for constructions where verb / participle use the same lemma within a sentence, clause, or phrase

    This is a syntax search, of course. When you're setting up each 'word' element, make sure to click 'matching skips levels' so you don't have to worry matching all the internal structure. The special sauce is to add an agreement operator to the second word telling it to match the lemma of the first word. You could, of course, use 'sentence' or 'phrase
    Posted to Logos 5 by Vincent Setterholm on Fri, Oct 24 2014
  • Re: Serious Bug: Wrong count in morph search results.

    [quote user="David Knoll"] Perhaps the two attributes were programmed to be mutually exclusive. [/quote] Since this thread was recently linked to, I'll give it some closure. We updated to BHW 4.18 , the latest version of the Westminster data (I don't think the 4.20 has ben released yet, though the Alan J. Groves site is down as I write this, so I can
    Posted to Logos Desktop Beta by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Oct 22 2014
  • Re: Reliability of Morph searches in Logos vs Bibleworks vs Accordance

    [quote user="David Knoll"] https://community.logos.com/forums/t/35511.aspx [/quote] David, we updated to the latest Westminster data almost a year ago ( version 4.18 , which you probably got for free if you already had the old 4.2) and teased apocopation out into a separate field in the structure of our morph codes so that there wouldn't be problems
    Posted to General by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Oct 22 2014
  • Re: Reliability of Morph searches in Logos vs Bibleworks vs Accordance

    [quote user="Chris Robbers (Faithlife)"] [quote user="Bradley Grainger (Faithlife)"]In this case, it appears that LEB is missing some roots. I've opened an inquiry about this.[/quote] This will be fixed in an upcoming update to the LEB reverse interlinear resource. Thanks for the report! [/quote] We actually have a significant update to LHB and all
    Posted to General by Vincent Setterholm on Wed, Oct 22 2014
  • Re: Typo: BHS Qohelet

    Yes, this is a bug: our software is normalizing Hebrew (changing the order of the combining marks) before display, arriving at combinations that the tables in the font were not designed to render properly. I've had a ticket in with development on this for some time. Thanks for reporting this.
    Posted to General by Vincent Setterholm on Tue, Oct 7 2014
Page 1 of 23 (442 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » |
Copyright 1992-2015 Faithlife / Logos Bible Software.