-
I wrote them this 2 days ago. If I do not get a response I will write to them every week for months until they at least acknowledge my letter. I am giving you a copy of what I wrote so you can possibly write them again in similar fashion. Does anyone at the Corporate and Sales Levels know about all the complaints about the New Note System? We hate to
-
Does anyone at the Corporate and Sales Levels know about all the complaints about the New Note System? Many people have emailed them with NO RESPONSE. We hate to complain, but this is HURTING our ministries and research. I have been with you for OVER 10 Years and I have upgraded 2 times. I have loved the program and have referred many people to it,
-
I am grateful for your answers. I care for you all. To answer your question: I have multiple notes open because I Multi-Task - Multi-TASKING IS ESSENTIAL to Efficiency - Identifying the note without having to click it, like it used to be in Logos 7, is enormously beneficial. You must have known how awesome that feature is or you would not have put it
-
There are Many reasons why duplicating a note is critical. I will only use one here: When I have an important collection of citations that will strengthen my ideas in multiple presentations, I want to be able to copy/duplicate them into another Notebook for that specific presentation. I do not want to have to go looking for it separately, which takes
-
Tagging notes is a great idea, but editing the copied version would not affect the others. That is the best way to set it up for the duplicated note.
-
Is it Possible to Link Resources Together Directly - (LRTD) - without having to go to a NOTE Short Video Explains what I mean - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH4CSRIWRiw&list=UUvKtswSPgm669Odrg8myn6A
-
I did not realize where this post was. So, yes, I will take it there. Thanks for letting me know. :) Peace to you always, my friend.
-
Thanks, but I want the KJV Bible with all the mistakes. This should be a part of our Collection without a doubt and it is a shame it is not available.
-
Help, Help, Help – PLEASE….. The NOTE System in Logos 8 needs to be fixed, please……… I cannot copy the Anchors from one note to another. I cannot rearrange the anchors. The anchor/links to all the information in books that I copy and paste into a note do not work in the BODY of the Note, anymore. The Citation does not
-
We have suggested many great Idea that will vastly improve Logos 8 Notes - For instance: Duplicating Notes instead of Just moving them. We all need to consolidate note, but, we also need to copy or Duplicate valuable inf ormation from one note to another. We need to be able to Copy Citation hyperlinks and anchors into duplicate notes. Check out our
-
Thanks, my friend. I appreciate that.
-
DID you notice that the collection you suggested "DOES NOT HAVE THE KJV in it? That is the ONLY one that I would want to make sure is absolutely included. And it is MISSING
-
That is a simple answer, my friend. When doing a google search for Bible versions, the link to this forum and string pope up.
-
Yes, That is exactly what it used to do in LOGOS 7 - That is what it should do in Logos 8. It would need to open up a NEW window altogether so that filters are not affected in other notebook tools.
-
Thanks my friend. If we get enough people to Bark Loud enough, they might listen. I have started a You-Tube channel to make our Voice heard on these issues.. Peace to you always
-
We should be able to Change the Highlight Style without having to Delete the anchors and notes in the passage. This is a major problem.
-
WOW - That was really helpful, indeed. Because I am using the same series of Highlights, you said, " it will pay off to have a custom highlight that combines all of those in one style ." How can I do this?
-
Thanks. It works good. Peace
-
I can understand why that is the case. Thanks
-
It may not be highlighted but may be colored due to a feature selected from a drop-down menu above in the toolbar. Check the 3 dots drop-down menu and uncheck some of the boxes. It is just an idea. Maybe I am wrong.