Search

Thanks everyone. I now have what I need.

Doc B - Thanks for thinking about it. Mark - Thanks for showing me the obvious. This is exactly what I wanted. Randy - Thanks for pointing to that thread. It gives me some ideas of other ways to play, as I explore what else I may be interested in.

[quote user="Rosie Perera"] Six years later and still no sight of it. I've added a post on UserVoice about it, so throw your votes at it and see if that helps: https://suggestbooks.uservoice.com/forums/308269-book-suggestions/suggestions/37621678-new-cambridge-bible-commentary-series [/quote] Thanks for the suggestion, Rosie. I've happily voted for

Good news, Francis. These are indeed the Loeb volumes. The Greek and English volumes are available separately. I picked up both the Greek and English editions of Hippocrates this way. And, yes, dynamic pricing works with them. They're not exactly the same as the Perseus volumes, although at first glance there is little difference (e.g. they include

[quote user="Randy W. Sims"] Andrew, Here is a small modification ... [/quote] Many thanks, Randy. That seems to work for the first collection I tested it on at least. I think ideally I would remove all references to publishers and series, leaving just authors. I would then add about another 1000 authors to cover Logos Ultimate (which incorporates all

[quote user="BillS"] [quote user="MJ. Smith"]and BillS away from what the request was for? [/quote] Nope. Support the original intent. But "fact checker" goes beyond that. What's fact? The view that most scholars support? Most scholars don't think one Isaiah could have written Isaiah, because they believe that no one could have predicted so accurately

3. On Hermeneutics in Hebrews "There has been widespread disagreement over the hermeneutical technique used, with some interpreters arguing for a Philonic type (see Philo) of allegorical exegesis (e.g., Sowers, Spicq), but most recent studies (Hanson, Longenecker) have shown a much closer correspondence with Qumran pesher, Jewish midrash and typology

I hope many of my comments above have illustrated that this is not just about checking statements that begin "most scholars say...". There are a whole host of different uses, but on a similar theme, I thought I'd add a couple more comments. Here are three examples from IVP's big black dictionary series that remains a bestseller in Logos. 1. On Hell

[quote user="EastTN"] [quote user="Dan Francis"] Still feels over all like a slippery slope that may rob some people of valuable insight. Barclay for example at times verges on universalism. yet even in the moments he does i dare say he usually offers a great deal to chew on that is very good. I hate someone not purchasing or using Barclay's Daily Study

[quote user="Gary Osborne"] [quote user="EastTN"] For me, it would still be very helpful if it were just limited to: Positions held Who holds/held them Scriptural basis appealed to by supporters of the position Links to resources supporting each position [/quote] This would be incredibly helpful to me. And while I'd appreciate having Scriptural documentation