Search

Search in sorted by
  • Re: Whom Would you like to see as "MVP" incluided.?

    HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Thu, Oct 14 2010
  • Re: Theological Question

    HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Thu, Dec 16 2010
  • Re: The Reason For The Season

    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Fri, Dec 24 2010
  • Re: Why less women?

    HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Dec 22 2010
  • Re: Why less women?

    [quote user="Dan DeVilder"]here is the spirit that upholds both uncompromising truth and a gentle spirit toward those in error:[/quote] [quote user="Dan DeVilder"] The donuts are reserved for the elect only. Those with holes in their theology get, well, . . . . the holes. [/quote] HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Dec 22 2010
  • Re: Why less women?

    [quote user="Bill Coley"] Acceptance doesn't mean agreement. It means...acceptance.[/quote] That would depend on which definition you choose to attach to the word..."Accept" –verb (used with object) 1. to take or receive (something offered); receive with approval or favor: to accept a present; to accept a proposal. 2. to agree or consent to; accede
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Dec 22 2010
  • Re: Why less women?

    [quote user="Bill Coley"]I take definitions 5, 6, 9, and 12.... As in, "I accept (welcome, affirm, receive) you as part of the Body of Christ."[/quote] HHHMMMmmm~~~ But, Do you reject folks who choose 7 or 8?
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Dec 22 2010
  • Re: Why less women?

    [quote user="Bill Coley"]Acceptance doesn't mean agreement. It means...acceptance.[/quote] [quote user="Bill Coley"] [quote user="Silent Sam"]But, Do you reject folks who choose 7 or 8?[/quote] Of course. Surely by now it must be obvious to you that you don't have to accept people to accept people. Bill [/quote] [quote user="Bill Coley"] I either don
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Dec 22 2010
  • Re: HELP, Concerning Paul's Authority.

    [quote user="Abi Gail"] [quote user="Jack Caviness"]Do you have Normal Geisler's Apologetics Library The Norman L. Geisler Apologetics Library ?[/quote] NOT YET ! ...EDIT: Now I Do [/quote] HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Dec 29 2010
  • Re: Why less women?

    HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Dec 22 2010
  • Re: Why less women?

    [quote user="Denise Barnhart"]Silent Sam 'looks' like he's helping push the train off the tracks! Silent Sam?![/quote] HHHMMMmmm~~~ I'm still warning of a train that has jumped the tracks. ... Specifically, Mz. Moore's ministry.
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Tue, Dec 21 2010
  • Re: Pre-Pub Overkill

    [quote user="Thomas Black"]the execution is another thing entirely. [/quote] HHHMMMmmm~~~ They execute you if you cancel your order?
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Wed, Jan 5 2011
  • Re: New KF Base Packages

    [quote user="Douglas Alvarenga"]Anyway, as the enigmatic silent sam woud say: " ........ "[/quote] HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to General by Silent Sam on Sat, Jan 8 2011
  • Re: Roman Catholic Resources

    Simply amazing... When it's a subject the MVPs are interested in debating, the post is allowed to ramble on forever. If a newbie suggests a subject, he/she is read his/her rights and cautioned to never let it happen again. Rank Has it's Privileges.
    Posted to Logos 4 by Silent Sam on Sat, Aug 28 2010
  • Re: Roman Catholic Resources

    [quote user="MJ. Smith"]What is more interesting to me is your concern about the guidelines when you are not a frequent poster.[/quote] Does my low post count constitute an infraction of forum rules?...I didn't know you had to have a star by your name to communicate here. And Furthermore: [quote user="MJ. Smith"]What is needed to get your interest focused
    Posted to Logos 4 by Silent Sam on Wed, Sep 1 2010
  • Re: Roman Catholic Resources

    Hi, Matthew; Nice of you to reach out to me. Sorry. I can't agree with you. I don't see where I have attacked anyone. I have , however, posted my opinion about an attitude here. I invite you to go back and read through the posts in this thread. See how many apply to Logos software, and how many apply to a theological debate. I have seen many threads
    Posted to Logos 4 by Silent Sam on Wed, Sep 1 2010
  • Re: Roman Catholic Resources

    I am seldom embarrassed over the courage of my conviction. Have I learned that past convictions were wrong? Of course...I'm human. I attempt to grow from those misunderstandings. I agree with your observation about John 3:15. It can be taken a step further by considering Romans 2:14. The gentiles...never having exposure to the Gospel could achieve salvation
    Posted to Logos 4 by Silent Sam on Wed, Sep 1 2010
  • Re: Roman Catholic Resources

    [quote user="MJ. Smith"]Welcome to the forums. It is always especially nice to have an addition from the Lutheran-Anglican-Catholic-Orthodox_Church of the East wpr;d. [/quote] HMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to Logos 4 by Silent Sam on Sun, Aug 29 2010
  • Re: Inductive Bible Study Method - How do I do this with Logos 4?

    [quote user="Kevin A. Purcell"] [quote user="MJ. Smith"]Was your post within these guidelines? (I honestly do not know the answer)[/quote] Isn't it ironic that the person bringing up the forum rules has a link in the signature area to a web site that seems to be giving away information, as do I. [/quote] HHHMMMmmm~~~
    Posted to Logos 4 by Silent Sam on Wed, Sep 22 2010
  • Re: Inductive Bible Study Method - How do I do this with Logos 4?

    [quote user="Matthew C Jones"]You could add your humming to your signature and save on typing it.[/quote] True...But I'm not in the " HHHMMMmmm~~~ " mode for every post.
    Posted to Logos 4 by Silent Sam on Wed, Sep 22 2010
Page 1 of 9 (161 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last » |