-
I do not feel comfortable in pushing the information about the revised edition on this forum. Faithlife and the moderator of this forum have been gracious to me. I do not want to abuse that kindness. DrV
-
It was not intentional, but it was wrong. I copied into a third document for research and then pasted into my commentary, and sometimes overlooked then crediting the source. No excuse. I was wrong. I apologize to my readers. Logos/Faithlife was right in what they did. I have repaired the problems and a second edition which will be issued with a different
-
Thanks, Jonathan. I tried to do some of what you mentioned in the Biblical Theology section. True, the "Applications" section is mainly homiletical suggestions, but that is because in the set number of sections that the EEC requires, there was no section on "Homiletics" so I used the last one for that purpose. Have you seen that the print volume is
-
Thanks Steve - and to all who have secured the early resources in the set. Today's Logos Blog features my volume on James. Logos has followed through on their commitment to print these volumes and mine is the first! I hope that the series is meeting your expectations and that it will also in the print format. The post does not mention that the print
-
Hi friends on the forum. I can't answer the "when" of the EEC completion, but as one of the authors I can express my delight that Logos has followed though on their commitment to also publish print copies of the commentaries. The Logos blog today features a brief background story on the nature of my James commentary. What it does not mention is that
-
Thanks to all for your kind words. My editor, Andrew Pitts, pushed me to make it better.
-
I have been told that Logos will be issuing in the new year the first printed volume in the EEC series, the commentary on James. Here is a review of the commentary posted today on the blog Pyromanicas. http://bit.ly/1jf0caO
-
I have been told that Logos will be issuing the first printed volume in the EEC series, the commentary on James. Here is a review of the commentary posted today.. http://bit.ly/1jf0caO
-
Great!
-
So here are the actual words of the Midrash Mishle. Surprisingly, the comment IS on 1:10 and illustrates how oftentimes the rabbis make points that we don't clearly see in the text. I have changed my own sentence to not limit the commands to fringes and phylacteries. The change will read as follows: --Some rabbis taught that obedience to certain commands
-
I will provide the English quote when I grab Vistozky's translation today in the TMC library. I only have the Hebrew Mishle and I don't want people to trust my translation.
-
I have been out of the country for three weeks. Yes, I did make a mistake on the reference in Proverbs. Eric Weiss is correct: It should be Prov 1:9 instead of Prov 1:10. Will make that correction the next round of edits. Thanks!
-
Jack, within a year? Boy will you be surprised! Hang on!
-
Logos posted the revised James EEC with the added commentary bibliography.
-
For those who have my James in the EEC, Logos just uploaded the new version that includes the omitted Commentary Bibliography. Good and fast work, Logos!
-
No, Martin. This bibliography will be added to the commentary and will be downloaded automatically to replace your commentary.
-
Thanks, Brother. let me know if there are things in the commentary that can be improved. Will
-
Oh yes. Thanks, N.B., for pointing this out.
-
I was about to point you to the end of the Introduction, after the selected Bibliography, for a list of over 50 commentaries that I submitted in the manuscript.That list is in the PDF of the commentary that I have. This must have been an inadvertent omission, and I will bring it to their attention immediately (they probably already know this by now
-
Yay! It surprised me too! I think you can still get it at the pre-pub price. http://bit.ly/TSBpaB Will