-
With less than 2 hours to go we aren't far from having this resource dip to $50 from what I can tell. If a few more would bid we might be able to save some cash. Just saying. :)
-
[quote user="David Carter"] [quote user="NB.Mick"]- the price point is much too high for a work that may be had for free elsewhere?[/quote] Indeed. I've been in at $20 for over two years, basically so I would get notified when it was about to cross the line and could then decide whether to adjust my bid. I won't be adjusting it to the current $90 or
-
Fortunately for my wallet, Logos continues to be painfully slow with adding more Pentecostal works, and I doubt we'll see a Pentecostal Base Package any time soon. So I'm saved from the anguish that afflicts many others here. But truth be told, I'd at least like to have the chance to be anguished.
-
Thanks for the info, Graham!
-
Still no news. Sigh...
-
I'm with this suggestion all the way. The Fire Bible (aka Full Life Study Bible) being at the top of the list. It's an incredibly important resource for Pentecostals that isn't based on any Word of Faith/Prosperity stuff. Just a solid, fundamental study bible from a conservative, Pentecostal position (and that's not an oxymoron either). Other Bible
-
John, I was just poking fun at my Reformed friends. Nothing sinister, I assure you.
-
[quote user="John Kaess"] [quote user="Gary Osborne"]I agree concerning diversity, but I wouldn't limit it to gender diversity. I vote for more theological diversity. It seems like this year it's more about Hyper-Calvinism vs semi-Hyper Calvinism vs Reformed Theology vs partial TULIP theology. The majority of it is weighted in the direction of one theological
-
I agree concerning diversity, but I wouldn't limit it to gender diversity. I vote for more theological diversity. It seems like this year it's more about Hyper-Calvinism vs semi-Hyper Calvinism vs Reformed Theology vs partial TULIP theology. The majority of it is weighted in the direction of one theological stream. Being a conservative, but committed
-
I cannot emphasize how absolutely critical this resource is for Charismatics and Pentecostals. It's THE standard Study Bible for so, so many people of this persuasion. I personally use this resource every single day and have to resort to another Bible program (in spite of loving Logos and using it as well). I'd love to use Logos exclusively, but until
-
As well as all his other works ("Why Revival Tarries", "Sodom had no Bible", "Revival Praying", etc).
-
Great news, Mark! This is easily my #1 "hope it comes soon" resource in Logos. Looking forward to it.
-
No offense was intended. I've got that bible as well and it is nice. But it's not nearly as thick and in depth as the "Full Life"/"Fire Bible". It's just not. That's all I meant.
-
Both Michael Brown and Craig Keener take apart MacArthur's premise, imho. What's really funny to me is that they are both far more "Sola Scriptura" on this issue than MacArthur is, even though that's his rallying cry all the time. But not on this issue. I think "Authentic Fire" should be added to Logos immediately as a counter-balance to "Strange Fire
-
Agreed. Very important works that Logos should add.
-
[quote user="Dan Langston"] There is a need for more Classical Pentecostal works. As stated in many posts , the former "Full Life Study Bible" that is now labeled the "Fire Bible". It is in the other two competitors but NOT in Logos. One wonders why????? when Jimmy Swaggart and the LDS are represented. The Life in the Spirit Bible Commentary is not
-
[quote user="Super.Tramp"] If I remember correctly Full Life Study Bible was included in the Libronix resource Lifeworks of Jack Hayford. [/quote] That's a different study bible entirely. It's called the Spirit-Filled Life Study Bible. And yes, it's by Hayford. The one we are referring to is completely different (and far superior to that light-weight
-
Logos still not carrying the Fire Bible is, imho, the biggest head-scratcher and most important resource they don't offer that other bible programs do offer. It honestly makes absolutely no sense and I have to believe they simply haven't pursued it. In the past I've been critical of the proportionality of certain theological streams. If you lean Reformed
-
As was I. This is highly disappointing.
-
Of all the non-Pentecostal groups (i.e. Denominations & Fellowships) around the Plymouth Brethren have generally produced people who's emphasis have been a draw for Pentecostals. Muller emphasized faith in God and prayer heavily, and these are two of the mainstays in our theology and practicality. I think of more modern, albeit less well-known Plymouth