Search

Search in sorted by
  • Re: Picky, picky, picky ... lectionary miscoding

    Thanks for catching this. We fixed a number of mis-labeled things in creating the 4.0 resource, but obviously some errors slipped through the cracks. [quote]On the lectionary issue I found that the CCT publication does not label them, allowing the denominations to continue their historical conventions. But in the CCT discussions there is the implication
    Posted to Logos 4 by Louis St. Hilaire on Fri, Dec 4 2009
  • Re: LSJ still defective

    A fix with the Greek headwords in place should be going out shortly.
    Posted to General by Louis St. Hilaire on Wed, Nov 25 2009
  • Re: ante-nicene fathers volume 4

    An update correcting ANF 4 is on the way. [quote]I also think that I am missing v9[/quote] Volume IX of the Ante-Nicene Fathers was an index volume that was never included in the product. Check your 3.0 library and you'll notice it's missing there also.
    Posted to Logos 4 by Louis St. Hilaire on Mon, Nov 16 2009
  • Re: Wishlist for Lectionaries

    L3 displayed a color for the season and a color specific to the celebration. This was eliminated as it seemed either redundant (where they were the same) or confusing (where they weren't the same). I have to admit that I'm unsure what the source was originally for the colors we have associated with the RCL in our resource. It is certainly true that
    Posted to Logos 4 by Louis St. Hilaire on Sun, Nov 15 2009
  • Re: Custom lectionaries ok?

    [quote user="MJ. Smith"]This statement concerns me, if I understand it correctly. To support historic lectionaries (unfortunately, the best source of these is now off-line) only liturgical dates are really applicable. Obviously, I wouldn't expect this to be linked into the lectionary home page display, but I would expect to have them behave as lectionaries
    Posted to Logos 4 by Louis St. Hilaire on Fri, Nov 13 2009
  • Re: Custom lectionaries ok?

    Damian, Thanks for the clarification. I'm familiar with Fr. Just's site, but haven't specifically reviewed his information on regional differences. I mainly had calendar and translation differences in mind, but the adjustments to the selections made by the US bishops would, of course, make our data specifically American at those points. As to solemnities
    Posted to Logos 4 by Louis St. Hilaire on Thu, Nov 12 2009
  • Re: Custom lectionaries ok?

    [quote user="MJ. Smith"]The Lectionary should be, I believe, complete and accurate ... and carefully identified i.e. not just "Roman Catholic Lectionary" but specifically Australian, Canadian, ... so that people are not misled.[/quote] Someone from outside the States could correct me, but, as it stands, with only the Sunday data and the ability to choose
    Posted to Logos 4 by Louis St. Hilaire on Thu, Nov 12 2009
  • Re: Custom lectionaries ok?

    [quote user="Don Awalt"]Second, for example Ascension Sunday, there are two sets of readings for which the reader picks the appropriate one for their diocese, as some parts of the country celebrate the Seventh Sunday of Easter, and other parts (most actually) celebrate Ascension this Sunday. The Logos Catholic lectionary does not have Sunday Ascension
    Posted to Logos 4 by Louis St. Hilaire on Thu, Nov 12 2009
  • Re: The Rule of St Benedict

    Note that a different translation of Rule is also included in the Catholic Spirituality Collection now on pre-pub.
Page 25 of 25 (489 items) « First ... < Previous 21 22 23 24 25 |