Search

Search in sorted by
  • Re: Logos closes reseller channels

    [quote user="Rosie Perera"] I was providing the direct link to the Ambassador program page, which nobody else had done thus far[/quote] If Walter could not follow my active link to the blog entry & subsequently the Ambassador's program, he would be of little benefit to Logos in setting up a networked "affiliate" program. I would like to know how Walter
    Posted to Libronix (including Logos for Mac 1) by Matthew C Jones on Tue, Aug 24 2010
  • Re: Göttingen Septuagint (65 Vols.)

    Göttingen Septuagint (65 Vols.) http://www.logos.com/products/prepub/details/4951 is shipping SOON. So, I am asking for advice. Considering Logos has established a publishing relationship with Cambridge now http://blog.logos.com/archives/2010/08/cambridge_university_press_books_on_pre-pub.html and we have these two Pre-Pubs I find worthwhile: Cambridge
    Posted to Logos 4 by Matthew C Jones on Thu, Aug 19 2010
  • Re: A lowered price for Barth's Church Dogmatics?

    [quote user="R. Mansfield"]you don't have to sell me on the advantages of electronic books.[/quote] I really did not think I would have to. You are on the forums and use Logos. You must have made the transition. [quote user="R. Mansfield"]weighing $700 (which I don't have) for the electronic copy vs. $100 for the physical set (which I can probably scrounge
    Posted to Suggestions by Matthew C Jones on Thu, Aug 19 2010
  • Re: Tozer Collection

    [quote user="John Kaess"] but if my integerity and motives are being called into question[/quote] John, I don't think it was intended that way. Most of us got the same email this week. [quote user="John Kaess"]However $400 vs $20 can't be explained by a difference in format. [/quote] Tozer has been out quite a while in WS format. Every now and then
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Sun, Aug 22 2010
  • Re: New Book Reviewed in Logos 4 Home Pages - The Bible & Archeology

    [quote user="bill frederick"] Hi, I read about Subject new book, but see it was copyrighted back in 1982, I looked on Logos to see if it is a new offering from Logos and "struck out". Either I am a beginning batter or it is not a Logos offering. So, when I read this, I am looking for the "so-what" action. What am I being suggested to do - go get the
    Posted to Logos 4 by Matthew C Jones on Sun, Aug 22 2010
  • Re: Do I have permission to reference Calvin's Commentaries?

    Calvin won't mind. He might even be pleased
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Sun, Aug 22 2010
  • Re: Tozer Collection

    [quote user="John Kaess"] I really still have to ask why the resource costs 20 times more in Logos. I'm serious, there must be some kind of an explanation. Costs are not set without a rationalization. John[/quote] I know this will not explain the Logos pricing model on public domain titles but it may explain why some copyright titles are expensive while
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Mon, Aug 23 2010
  • Re: Is Logos still the best? (disappointment with Journal of Biblical Literature pre-pub turns into gripe asking this question)

    [quote user="Carmen Gauvin-O'Donnell"]Well, not to put too fine a point on it, Paul... but how does people not signing up for a pre-pub have anything to do with the quality of the Logos product (which wins hands down for sheer power of search capability).[/quote] I don't think Paul meant it that way. At least it did not sound like a "quality" complaint
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Sun, Aug 22 2010
  • Re: Is the Logos Engine Really Free?

    [quote user="Thomas Black"]That's the way I see it, though I stand ready to be corrected. :-)[/quote] I hate to leave a guy just standing there. Let me get you a chair by "correcting" the perspective a tinsy bit. [quote user="Thomas Black"]We could debate the difference between an addin and a resource, but I'm frankly not convinced of the difference
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Tue, Sep 7 2010
  • Re: A new type of pre-pub - it isn't in print yet!

    [quote user="Wilson Hines"] I think the best commentary on the Bible is the Bible itself,[/quote] Quite a healthy outlook. I do encourage you to consider learning from the maturity (and mistakes!) of the fellow travelers who walk in the way beside you. The receptiveness of the disciples as they walked the road to Emmaus is striking. After all, they
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Tue, Sep 7 2010
  • Re: A note from Lockman Foundation about the NASB 1977

    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Wed, Sep 8 2010
  • Re: Beating a dead horse

    [quote user="Peter Banks"]On the whole I would give Logos an 80%[/quote] Would that be approval rating or profit margin? (I think their take is a lot lower in the profit realm.) [quote user="Peter Banks"]However, I find interesting however that the public domain capacity found in the PBB was withdrawn when version 4 came out. When Barnes, Baxter, Gill
    Posted to Logos 4 by Matthew C Jones on Wed, Sep 8 2010
  • Re: A new type of pre-pub - it isn't in print yet!

    [quote user="Todd Phillips"] So there's no way I'm going to preorder a set that has yet to be written. Therefore, I'm going to have to wait until this set is released to see if there are volumes I want, [/quote] If you bought NICOT/NICNT for $600 or WBC for $300 in Pre-Pub, you'd be skipping through this forum thread. I'm still weighing my purchase
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Thu, Sep 9 2010
  • Re: A new type of pre-pub - it isn't in print yet!

    Matthew wrote: Will I end up canceling Pre-Pubs because they all ship at once? Tongue Tied (I don't want to speak for Todd, even tho" he would be wise to agree with me. ) [quote user="Wilson Hines"]Todd you hit the nail on the head. The pre-pub people at Logos need to have better timing. I know they would be smarter by releasing those pre-pubs out once
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Thu, Sep 9 2010
  • Re: A new type of pre-pub - it isn't in print yet!

    [quote user="Scott Lumsden"]you've made editorial decisions and are indeed promoting a position. I have no problem with Logos doing this, in fact I'm quite supportive and even excited that they've made this step. My point here is that at this point, Logos can't have it both ways.[/quote] Logos has not wavered off the same spot they have been standing
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Tue, Sep 14 2010
  • Re: A new type of pre-pub - it isn't in print yet!

    [quote user="Jeff Straub"]Logos is an amateur at publishing, at least commentary publishing .[/quote] There is a difference in digital publishing and traditional publishing. The old guard must change with the times or die. We saw Nelson undergo a big shakeup in company leadership earlier this year. Traditional publishers have been abandoning the big
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Mon, Sep 13 2010
  • Re: Don't kick yourself! Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, in Community Pricing

    [quote user="Joe Miller"]these older works still offer valuable historical perspective on the people/places/things being discussed.[/quote] Maybe Kevin (and many others) don't care to study the historical. I'll let them decide that value for themselves. It would seem to me the whole genre of Bible backgrounds references is based on this same question
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Fri, Sep 10 2010
  • Re: A new type of pre-pub - it isn't in print yet!

    [quote user="Todd Phillips"]Since you asked, here are a couple I'd buy if I still bought paper commentaries:[/quote] I'm sorry. I thought you were talking about individual digital volumes of NICNT. [quote user="Todd Phillips"]Nope. I'm just pointing out that they will just get my money if they offer the individual volumes eventually.[/quote] Another
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Fri, Sep 10 2010
  • Re: Any Thoughts on "Archaeology and the Bible"?

    [quote user="James W Bennett"] That volume will be more than worthless, it will be misleading. [/quote] I don't want you to feel left out so I will disagree with all three of you. If we can not read with scrutiny we should abandon using ALL source documents because ALL of them will veer off the truth at some point or another. They are just too close
    Posted to General by Matthew C Jones on Wed, Sep 15 2010
  • Re: Suggestion: dead is dead please

    I was rather embarrassed recently to answer a post from one year ago.
    Posted to Suggestions by Matthew C Jones on Thu, Oct 14 2010
Page 6 of 437 (8734 items) « First ... < Previous 4 5 6 7 8 Next > ... Last » |