-
I agree with what many others have said about improving features that already exist but have only been partially implemented or are in clear need of additional work. To add to the examples that have already been mentioned, there are still dictionaries and encyclopedias that have not been made compatible with Factbook.
-
[quote user="Denise"]'Best'?[/quote] Yes, "best." Commentariesthataregenerallyheldtobeofahigherqualityandperhapsmorehelpfulthanothercommentaries.com takes too long to type. In all seriousness, yes, I get your point and was expecting someone to say something along those lines before I ever made my initial post. Obviously "best" is a subjective term and
-
4. It might help keep top rated books that are not yet available in Logos on Faithlife's radar to add in the future
-
Here is a thought I had this morning. What if there was a Logos dataset containing the ratings used on bestcommentaries.com? There are several ways this data could be used, and I am sure others might be able to further refine or add to my ideas. 1. A library option to automatically prioritize commentaries based on the ratings. 2. An interactive tool
-
[quote user="Doc B"]That is the recommended way to do it[/quote] That's what I was thinking. Thank you for confirming this.
-
I am trying to start using advanced prioritization limits to prioritize my favorite commentaries for individual books of the Bible. Where I am running to problems is when there are multiple volumes within a single commentary series that cover the same book of the Bible. For example, in the Word Biblical Commentary there is Martin’s original commentary
-
Kyle, just bumping this thread in case you happen to still be monitoring it. It has been more than a year, and I was just wondering if there are any updates you are able to share. Thanks.
-
[quote user="JT (alabama24)"]Do you have a link to this in the store?[/quote] It is what Logos markets as Septuaginta: SESB Edition, but it is really just the edition of the Septuagint edited by Rahlfs and revised by Hanhart. I got my copy as part of a Stuttgart Scholarly Editions bundle that no longer appears to be for sale. It is pretty much the standard
-
Two requests: 1. Add the introductory material to the Rahlfs-Hanhart Septuaginta. 2. Add the footnotes to the 1901 ASV.
-
This is the message I see when I visit that page:
-
[quote user="Robert Kelbe"]it would be really convenient if we could search for all the manuscripts that contain a certain reference.[/quote] Robert, I had asked a similar question several years ago. See here . Thread includes helpful suggestions from forum members and also comment from Faithlife.
-
[quote user="Graham Criddle"] One thing I have found helpful this year - and want to recognise - is that we can see what resources are included in each option. To the best of my knowledge this is the first year it has happened. I hope this continues in the future. [/quote] This.
-
[quote user="Andrew Batishko (Faithlife)"]Your screenshot indicates that you are searching the NA28 Critical Apparatus resource (which you seem to have renamed).[/quote] You are correct that I did rename the resource, but I promise I am not using or searching the critical apparatus. The resource I have unsuccessfully been attempting to search is: LLS
-
[quote user="Lee"]Your tone comes across rather badly. My help ends here.[/quote] While I meant no offense, I have obviously caused some, and therefore I apologize. "Tone" can be subjective and misinterpreted when dealing the written word. If you will permit me, I would like to try explaining my thought process in my previous post with the goal of removing
-
[quote user="Lee"]The footnotes do appear in print, see this note about Matt. 2:18 [/quote] Perhaps "footnotes" is the wrong term. What I am looking for are the cross-references, which in the print edition are found in the outer margins of the page. [quote user="Lee"]The problem is that the apparatus notes only come up in a separate resource called
-
[quote user="Mark Barnes"]The symbol appears to be missing from many footnotes.[/quote] But why aren't the footnotes that do have it showing up? [quote user="Mark Barnes"]You could always search for <Gen - Mal>[/quote] I am specifically looking for examples of the NT citing the LXX, so this won't get me what I need. Thanks for the help, though
-
The NA28 editors use the symbol 𝔊 to indicate a reference to the LXX. I am trying to use Logos to find all such instances, but the search I am running only picks up occurrences of 𝔊 in the material either at the beginning or end of the NA28. It is not picking up any of the times the symbol is used as a cross-reference (what I am actually searching
-
Did you look the passage up in the LXX? The numbering of the psalms in the LXX does not always match up to the numbering found in the Hebrew text. Psalm 67:36 (LES): *Marvelous is God in his holy place. The God of Israel himself will give might and strength to his people. Blessed is God! The * contains a note stating that this verse in the LXX corresponds
-
The Notes Tool includes the ability to insert links into a note. When I am copying a location from a resource that will be used for a link, the options are to copy the location as URL, HTML, L4, WIKI, or RL. Each has a brief pop-up explanation, and I have read these, but can someone explain to me in plain English which option I want to choose for the
-
Looks like it was released in conjunction with Basics of Biblical Hebrew 3rd edition.