-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]Are you involved in the beta testing?[/quote] Not at this time [quote user="MJ. Smith"]This particular beta cycle has a feature eliminating most restarts for new resources particularly hard to test that I am sure will still have some installation-dependent bugs ..[/quote] Thus the appeal, to me, of different distribution rings
-
George Somsel will have something to share about this.
-
[quote user="Jerry Laviña"]my installation disks are formatted for Windows.[/quote] Jerry - If you're prior install was synchronized with the Faithlife servers you're current install should include the licensing for the resources you are missing. Customer service at least should be able to confirm y ou've got the resource licensing. Resources licensed
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]The problem with Verbum is that the software functionality doesn't divide along the same lines as the theological marketing - which leave a group of mainstream Protestants with a choice of being unhappy Verbum users or unhappy Logos users.[/quote] Agreed Also let's not overlook the mood of Orthodox customers - who have no base
-
[quote user="steve clark"]JAL's problem seems to be with the internet browsers trying to display a large number of book-covers.[/quote] Thank you Steve, sometime I will install and try an alternate browser. Once again thanks for providing, and supporting, LLR.
-
I note that the most costly Spanish-language base package Tesoro would be eighth if included it in these lists. That's higher than any English-language denominational base package.
-
[quote user="JAL"]I'm encouraged by the rankings of less costly base packages, it seems to indicate that the customer base is continuing to grow.[/quote] Then again, maybe this just indicates that many took a least costly path updating to L6 before the free update was available.
-
[quote user="NB.Mick"]And still again, it may indicate that owners of large libraries rounded off their main package by taking advantage of dynamic pricing for the small denominational packages.[/quote] Agreed - see my earlier post. [quote user="JAL"]The Dynamic Price incentive may be the most influential factor driving sales for many of the other base
-
*smile*
Posted to
Files
by
JAL
on
Sun, May 10 2015
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"] What would be gained, especially if the layout was available via the Logos Now web application and the mobile apps: a very nice way to introduce Logos into the Sunday morning classroom at an inexpensive price with the ability to sell Bible dictionaries, atlas, reverse interlinear Bibles etc. both for the teachers and for the
-
[quote user="Rosie Perera"]Wow, I'd love to have this in Logos![/quote] Enthusiastic agreement - I like your suggestions generally and this one in particular.
-
[quote user="Clifford B. Kvidahl"] If you want a taste of what this book will be on, here is a lecture from Bob Gundry. Peter: False Disciple and Apostate According to St. Matthew [/quote] Here is a link to the text of a response to Gundry's lecture, it was presented as part of the event at Westmont. (a four page PDF) https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source
-
[quote user="Martin H Weber"]P.S. Dynamic pricing is already operative--a fabulous accomplishment for the Faithlife team![/quote][<:o)]
-
[quote user="Josh Hunt"]I was hoping someone actually knew if they are the same or not.[/quote] Josh - as per my first reply - the base content is the same, some metadata may be different. The five volume set is a single Logos resource while the other set is 60 Logos resources.
-
Well earned recognition. I'm glad you're contributing officially with Faithlife too. Thank you very much.
-
Thank you for LLR. I've only recently first used the product and, IMO, it fills a need. I've encountered one small problem with the library shelf display function. Very many of the cover images fail to display. I don't value this feature as much so didn't immediately report. FWIW - I was working with a catalogue from a Verbum 6.2 installation. This
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]I don't think that the Verbum audience developed as Faithlife expected - the users are a much more diverse than the marketing.[/quote] I suspect that you may be correct in the short term. I have thought, maybe hoped even, that Verbum is a long-term endeavor to reach a specific audience. I am not Roman Catholic but accept the
-
[quote user="Rick Ratzlaff"]I'm so glad Christ collected a bunch of "losers" and filled them to turn the world upside down. My point is that scripture is a lot simpler than academia often makes it out to be.[/quote] Must object to the popular meme, that the disciples were losers - a mix of successful buisiness owners and educated men seems more indicated
-
[quote user="Josh Hunt"]I thought these would both be based on the same underlying TR text ...[/quote] As far as I know this is correct. Rick Brannan (Faithlife) discussed this here: https://community.logos.com/forums/p/5553/86821.aspx#86821
-
Though I appreciate the potential good effect that the six week development cycle may provide, being the cautious sort, I prefer to wait for code to be proven a while longer before updating. I've just read an article that describes the way Microsoft plans to address my preference. They refer to this as distribution rings. I would like for Faithlife