Morph search - am I just not getting it?

Adrian Frost

I'm trying to do a Morph search (my first ) using the following:

παύω@V?M

I've also tried παύω@V?M????? so that the ?s match up with what shows on the Morph table that displays.

I've tried it in different bible versions: ESV, NA27, LGNTI and I never get any results.
The same search in Logos 3 using [παύω=V?M?????] returns 13 verses.

Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? It feels like I've missed something really simple but I can't see what it is.

Kevin Becker

Try lemma:παύω@V?M. Logos needs the lemma: tag, otherwise it's looking for a word that is spelled παύω and is a Middle Verb. Of course, no such thing exists!

John Fidel

Try this:

lemma:παύω@V?M

I actually typed in g:pauw then selected the lemma, typed in @ and then selected the items from the drop down menu. You need lemma: before the greek text.

Robert Pavich

Adrian,

It works for me...two things come to mind that might be the cause of your problems:

1.) do you have "ESV" and then also "Logos Greek Morphology" selected on the title bar? It COULD be set at Andersen-Forbes-Hebrew while still on ESV.

2.) Are you picking from the list of words to make sure you are actually getting a lemma? It seems like you must be...

 

Are you typing this:

g:pau and then letting Logos drop the menu of words and pick "pauw stop, cease" from the drop down menu?

 

EDITED TO ADD: Man John...you're fast!

You don't have to type lemma...just type g: and then the letters...

Adrian Frost

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79389#Comment_79389

Wonderful! Thankyou very much for the help.

A supplementary question if I may...

I get 26 results in 13 verses and this becomes really obvious when I show the results "aligned" every instance is basically doubled up... is this normal?

Kevin Becker

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79393#Comment_79393

Adrian Frost said:

Wonderful! Thankyou very much for the help.

A supplementary question if I may...

I get 26 results in 13 verses and this becomes really obvious when I show the results "aligned" every instance is basically doubled up... is this normal?

Yes, for some reason the lemma counts as a hit and the morphology counts as a hit.

Adrian Frost

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79393#Comment_79393

Hi Robert, your reply appeared after I'd submitted my first response.

I did have the Logos Morphology selected, although I did notice that if you close the search that Andersen-Forbes then comes up next time you open the morph search. I've read somewhere that this is a known bug so was at least trying to be careful of that one [:)]

I entered the greek work by right-click copying from the Greek text. Hadn't tried the g: syntax.

Thanks for the help.

Adrian Frost

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79395#Comment_79395

I need to wait longer before replying [:D]

Thanks Kevin for the info on lemma and morphology both counting as a hit. Confusion resolved... at least until the next time.

Robert Pavich

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79396#Comment_79396

Adrian,

you should be getting 15 hits in 15 verses with no "doubling"....

Adrian Frost

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79398#Comment_79398

Robert,

I've just tried lemma:παύω on its own and that did indeed return 15 hits with no repeats. Thanks

Finally getting the hang of this stuff [:D]

 

Robert Pavich

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79394#Comment_79394

 

 

Kevin Becker said:

I show the results "aligned" every instance is basically doubled up... is this normal?

Kevin Becker said:

Yes, for some reason the lemma counts as a hit and the morphology counts as a hit.

 

Hmmm....not for me it's not...

Kevin Becker

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79419#Comment_79419

Robert Pavich said:

Hmmm....not for me it's not...

It doubles them up in the NA27 (where real morph searching occurs [:P]), but not in a reverse interlinear.

Robert Pavich

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79423#Comment_79423

Kevin Becker said:

It doubles them up in the NA27 (where real morph searching occurs ), but not in a reverse interlinear.

Ahh...thanks Kevin...

Robert Pavich

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/79424#Comment_79424

And just why does it do that?

At the very least have a "check box" available to pick which hits you want to see...arggg...

 

I did a search for "holos in the same clause as pas" and had to dig through multiple, multiple hits ...it was aggravating!