Adding the cross references to other Logos/Verbum works?

OK, so reading Congar's The Meaning of Tradition, I came across a section on page 83 where it made reference to Denzinger. It highlighted the word Denzinger, but the link to the passage was not there. I'm not sure if this was an editorial decision on the part of Logos or an oversight, but I was wondering if we could get these cross references acknowledged.

Apologies if this is in the wrong place

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Graham Criddle

OK, so reading Congar's The Meaning of Tradition, I came across a section on page 83 where it made reference to Denzinger

Do you mean the section highlighted in red below?

If so I'm not sure that Logos carries the volume to link to - but I could have missed it. Do you actually have the resource in Logos format? Do you know if it is available?

David Wanat

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/729764#Comment_729764

OK, so reading Congar's The Meaning of Tradition, I came across a section on page 83 where it made reference to Denzinger

Do you mean the section highlighted in red below?

If so I'm not sure that Logos carries the volume to link to - but I could have missed it. Do you actually have the resource in Logos format? Do you know if it is available?

That is the reference, and the work is one you have, under the name of "Sources of Catholic Dogma" found here: https://verbum.com/products/13253/the-sources-of-catholic-dogma

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/729765#Comment_729765

That is the reference, and the work is one you have, under the name of "Sources of Catholic Dogma"

Thanks for the clarification.

We will need to see if someone from Faithlife comments on this.

You could also flag it using the "report typo" function (in the right-click menu) pointing out, in the comment field, that the link should be included

David Wanat

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/729768#Comment_729768

That is the reference, and the work is one you have, under the name of "Sources of Catholic Dogma"

Thanks for the clarification.

We will need to see if someone from Faithlife comments on this.

You could also flag it using the "report typo" function (in the right-click menu) pointing out, in the comment field, that the link should be included

OK, I can do that--I was not even aware that was something I could do. Thanks.

Alex Renn

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/729769#Comment_729769

That is the reference, and the work is one you have, under the name of "Sources of Catholic Dogma"

Thanks for the clarification.

We will need to see if someone from Faithlife comments on this.

You could also flag it using the "report typo" function (in the right-click menu) pointing out, in the comment field, that the link should be included

OK, I can do that--I was not even aware that was something I could do. Thanks.

David, in the case of a single missed tag, the "report typo" function is the way to go. If the problem is more widespread, the forums are better.

We will look into this and make sure the problem is addressed (whether it's just this reference, or a more systematic issue with this resource).

Thanks for reporting it!