See this screencast.
Comes back as not accessible
Sorry, check again!
It now works but I can't see what is wrong
Please describe the problem.
The tabs are overlapping. The biggest annoyance is the "movement" of the tabs as each one is selected. Perhaps it is most definitive to check out the ESV/HDNT tabs. Watch the boundary between the tabs in relation to the reference box as they switch back and forth. Basically the boundary moves left/right by approximately the width of a letter.
The tabs are overlapping.
What I see in your screencast—and on my Mac—is the tab expanding to include the x that enables closing the tab. To me, this is a desirable movement.
Thanks for "checking in" Jack! I figured out that the issue is related to program scaling. I made another screencast with my screen resolution lower so that everything is bigger, and thus more visible in the screencast. BTW, I'm on a rMBP running OS X 10.10.3
What I see in your screencast—and on my Mac—is the tab expanding to include the x that enables closing the tab. To me, this is a desirable movement. Thanks for "checking in" Jack! I figured out that the issue is related to program scaling. I made another screencast with my screen resolution lower so that everything is bigger, and thus more visible in the screencast. BTW, I'm on a rMBP running OS X 10.10.3
Sorry, Reuben, bus I still do not see a problem. As a tab is selected it expands to accommodate the x for closure of the tab. That is still all I see. I am using a 27" iMac with OS 10.10.3.
Sorry, Reuben, bus I still do not see a problem
Are you saying that you can't see problem on your iMac or on the new screencast or both?
I know exactly what you are talking about. It has been an irritant of mine for some time. I never bothered reporting it (as I just gave it up to the "Logos way"). There are a host of little UI inconsistencies and "ugliness". Many of these, as you have discovered, are related to program scaling. I prefer to have my scaling set much smaller, so I live with it. I consider them bugs as they are related to a feature that isn't working well. But, it doesn't seem to be that important. I think many of these have to do with the underlying Chromium Foundation, so it may be out of Logos' control. But, in my experience, it would not be unlike Logos to skimp on quality in this fashion.
I figured out that the issue is related to program scaling.
Thank you for creating the new screencast. I'll create a case for a Developer to investigate this issue.
I'll create a case for a Developer to investigate this issue.
Thanks Angela, I really appreciate it!
Sorry, Reuben, bus I still do not see a problem Are you saying that you can't see problem on your iMac or on the new screencast or both?
both
Might I suggest an appointment with your optometrist?! 😎😜
Any update on this? The issue is still present in 6.4-RC1
Not due for another visit until October [:D] I see the tab expand to accommodate the x for closure, but nothing abnormal.
I'll create a case for a Developer to investigate this issue. Any update on this? The issue is still present in 6.4-RC1
The case is still active in Development. Once it gets fixed we will include it in the release notes and reply to this thread letting you know. [:)]
I'll create a case for a Developer to investigate this issue. Any update on this? The issue is still present in 6.4-RC1 The case is still active in Development. Once it gets fixed we will include it in the release notes and reply to this thread letting you know.
The case is still active in Development. Once it gets fixed we will include it in the release notes and reply to this thread letting you know.
Ok, no problem! Because you used the word "investigate" I guess I got the feeling that a developer would look into whether it needs to be fixed or not. I misinterpreted apparently, and apologize. As long as I know it's been submitted for fixing, I can relax and "drop" the issue so-to-speak. Thanks for your response!
Errr....maybe I'm not "dropping the issue"!...but... Is there any way to bump this a bit higher in the development queue?
What is your Program Scaling currently set to?
The problem used to be noticeably worse at 90% (rather than smaller or larger), so I generally avoided that scaling and chose 80 or 100. Switching it to 90 I can see that something changed and things are much better! The only thing that is still noticeable is the slight offset of the bottom border (between the tabs and resource window) when the border reaches the end of the "+" tab.
The offset is slight enough, however, that I'd say leave good enough alone! So now I'll go back to my beloved 90%! Thank you. I might have missed the fix in the release notes (unless it was my update to El Capitan that changed it(?)), and there hadn't been the promised reply to this thread so I assumed it was still an issue.
Thanks!
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
