Strange coding causes search highlighting truncated

MJ. Smith
MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,861
edited November 2024 in English Forum

Why isn't Judas included in the highlight? Okay I figured it out ... Logos has coded "Judas" and "not Iscariot" separately as "Judas (son of James)" But why the double coding for subject? It doesn't double for agent.

Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

Comments

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 33,187

    MJ. Smith said:

    Why isn't Judas included in the highlight? Okay I figured it out ... Logos has coded "Judas" and "not Iscariot" separately as "Judas (son of James)" But why the double coding for subject? It doesn't double for agent.

    Maybe because are two separate clauses with the second clarifying the first

    whereas there is just a single identification of the agent

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,861

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • Rick Brannan (Logos)
    Rick Brannan (Logos) Member, Logos Employee Posts: 1,862

    Hi MJ.

    There are two hits in the single verse (Jn 14.22) due to the clause embedding. "not Iscariot" is analyzed as a verbless clause within the subject. You've got the clause where the subject occurs; within the subject the embedded clause also fires as a hit (because "Judas [who is] not Iscariot" is analyzed as the whole name, I believe).

    Rick Brannan
    Data Wrangler, Faithlife
    My books in print