6.9 beta 1: Bug report and feedback on improvements in "Lemma in Passage"

Mark Barnes

Thanks for the improvements to "Lemma in Passage". The "Other Lemmas" section is surprisingly interesting, and a great addition. It's really useful to see what else is discussed.

(1) I think single letters ought to be excluded (α, β, γ, etc.). They're nearly always false positives.

(2) It would be helpful to separate out Greek and Hebrew lemmas within both sections.

(3) It's annoying to keep having to click "more" every ten times. I don't mind only showing 10 at the beginning, but clicking more should show at least another 50 IMO.

(4) Septuagint data is great! I hadn't noticed it before.

(5) I noticed that λ is getting placed under the lemma for Χ, rather than Λ. (Use 1 Cor 14:5 as a test if you need to find one.)

Rick Brannan (Logos)

(1) I think single letters ought to be excluded (α, β, γ, etc.). They're nearly always false positives

I think I've already supported that in theory. To apply it to all the data would require re-running on all the commentaries, which takes some time. That'll probably happen sometime before 6.9 goes RC. But since I'm on holiday the rest of the year, not before January. [:D]

(below added after original post)

(4) Septuagint data is great! I hadn't noticed it before.

Thanks! You may also notice some Hebrew popping up in the NT sections at times.

(5) I noticed that λ is getting placed under the lemma for Χ, rather than Λ. (Use 1 Cor 14:5 as a test if you need to find one.)

Not supporting single-letter lemmatization will address this too.