nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Logos forums misbehaving

MJ. Smith

I have looked unsuccessfully for some early book recommendations that would have been in the Catholic Products section.

Yesterday, I found one from 2010 and bumped it. However there were no entries in the forum prior to it so the others were not found.

Today, no entries prior to 2015 are visible. Where is our history?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Doc B

Where is our history?

Looks like we may be doomed to repeat it.

FWIW, I can see posts back to 2008 or so in the few forums I checked. Perhaps they pulled a JJ Abrams and did some kind of time warp to recover our history.

David A Egolf

I have looked unsuccessfully for some early book recommendations that would have been in the Catholic Products section.

Yesterday, I found one from 2010 and bumped it. However there were no entries in the forum prior to it so the others were not found.

Today, no entries prior to 2015 are visible. Where is our history?

I located this thread whose last post is in 2009: https://community.logos.com/forums/p/7608/60979.aspx#60979

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/793196#Comment_793196

FWIW, I can see posts back to 2008 or so in the few forums I checked

I can in all forums except the Catholic Products forums which spent some time suspended. It's resurrection is flaky.

David A Egolf

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/793214#Comment_793214

I'm sorry. I can't resist.

FWIW, I can see posts back to 2008 or so in the few forums I checked

I can in all forums except the Catholic Products forums which spent some time suspended. It's resurrection is flaky.

So you are saying that the Roman Catholics had a flaky view of resurrection which caused them to be briefly suspended?!

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/793215#Comment_793215

[:D]