Here is a cool but incomplete table - the tables in the resource supporting it are also interesting.
This is taken from Thomas, Robert L. How to Choose a Bible Version: An Introductory Guide to English Translations. Fearn, Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications, 2000..
With the addition of Vaticanicus and perhaps a few other major manuscripts it would be even more interesting.
It would be very useful to have an interactive that worked on the translations that have reverse interlinears that would display (a) the detail behind this data (b) this data and (c) the translations ranked as the correspond to particular manuscripts.
from the same source:
[quote]
Percentage agreements are not too meaningful because the list of passages is not exhaustive, but it is of interest to rank the translations in the order of their closeness to the Alexandrian family in this set of passages. The resulting order is RSV, NASB, ESV, NASBU, HCSB, NIV, TNIV, NRSV, REB, JB, NJB, TEV, NAB, NEB, CEV, PME, NCV, NLT, MES, and LB. (The NIrV follows the same textual basis as the NIV). The last in this sequence is the Living Bible, but it still agrees with the Alexandrian reading in 86% of these 165 passages.
Robert L. Thomas, How to Choose a Bible Version: An Introductory Guide to English Translations (Fearn, Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications, 2000), 85.
