Inexplicable and unacceptable alignment of ESV/LHB

Reuben Helmuth

I've come across many, many instances of inaccurate alignment, but I haven't found an example that beats this one:

Unless perhaps it's this:

Given that the ESV is ... not the most obscure bible out there, and is Logos' default "preferred Bible," one would expect a much higher degree of accuracy and attention to detail.

I rarely show the interlinear ribbon, but this problem is quite noticeable in Bible Word Studies as well as Hebrew lemma searches in the ESV. This makes the results of doing translation comparisons (among many other tasks) unreliable at best.

Unfortunately there is no efficient and/or effective way to address specific problems of this nature, apart from the forums. Regardless of whether any type of crowdsourcing is employed, we need a "report typo" for links, formatting, tagging, etc.

Reuben Helmuth

Bump

Could someone from Faithlife at least acknowledge seeing this?

JT (alabama24)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/833793#Comment_833793

I'll see if I can flag someone down. 

Rick Brannan (Logos)

Reuben, can you go to resource information and record the versions of the resources you've got on your computer?

This looks to me like something that would be caused by resources (the Bible text and the underlying reverse interlinear resource) being out of sync. 

Are these the versions you've got? I reproduce your above with these versions.

LLS:1.0.710

2015-02-03T19:45:56Z

ESV.logos4

RVI:ESVNT

2015-02-03T19:31:04Z

ESVNT.lbsrvi

RVI:ESVOT

2015-02-03T19:31:04Z

ESVOT.lbsrvi

Isaiah Hoogendyk (Faithlife)

Working on a fix for this. Looking at the few verses before and after 1 Sam 9:6, I didn't see any "off by one" types of errors, except for a few in verse 7. 

Ezra 10:43 is also being adjusted.

Thanks for letting us know!

Reuben Helmuth

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/833808#Comment_833808

Thanks everyone!

Rick, my versions match the ones you've posted.