Why is there a different verb tense listed in Eph 2:8 in the ESV interlinear vs. the NASB interlinea

Hi,

So I am working on a message on salvation and I noticed that in my NASB interlinear that salvation is Aorist tense in v5, a future sense in v 7 and a present tense in v8. (Pretty cool to wade through this!) However, when I switched over to check this out in the ESV I find that it is an Aorist in v5, future sense in the construction of v7 and perfect passive in v8!

Anyone know why the difference? Is this an error in Logos 6? ESV using a different version of NA???

Thanks

God bless...

Mark

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Graham Criddle

I've just checked this on my iPad - not at my computer at the moment - and both ESV and NASB show perfect passive in v8

What version info do you have for NSAB?

Click the "I" button at the to right of the resource and scroll down to the bottom to check

GregW

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/833989#Comment_833989

I've just checked this on my iPad - not at my computer at the moment - and both ESV and NASB show perfect passive in v8

What version info do you have for NSAB?

Click the "I" button at the to right of the resource and scroll down to the bottom to check

I've just checked on my desktop, and both versions show perfect passive participles in both verses 5 and 8. They are both used with the present tense of the verb "to be". In verse 7, the only finite verb is an aorist middle subjunctive, which you could argue has a future dimension to it as it's part of a ἵνα clause and is referring to the ages to come.

Both interlinears have the same forms as NA28, that is using NASB95 and ESV.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/834075#Comment_834075

I've just checked on my desktop, and both versions show perfect passive participles in both verses 5 and 8

Agreed.

That's why I am wondering if it is a problem with an old version of NASB on Mark's computer.

Mark - mine shows

What do you have?