I appreciate the attempt to bridge between Logos and my whole sermon prep workflow and the Sunday worship presentation done in Proclaim. Having used the sermon editor for a couple of weeks, let me float out some observations and see if they find resonance with anyone else. I tend to think that the use of visual projection in a sermon needs to be done very intentionally. I find that I tend to use too much text and too few graphics and video clips. I'm afraid that the sermon editor in its present form doesn't help me much in this respect.
For example, this week I preached from Romans 4:1-12 which sent me scurying for images of Paul, Abraham and David. My tool of choice is to start with a Google Image search to see what artwork I can uncover. Those go into a big bin to be sorted through and used as I'm finalizing the Proclaim presentation. I don't save a lot of time by having the sermon editor copy in Psalm 32:1-2 as opposed to entering the Bible slide in Proclaim. My real time investment is reworking the slide to have the David graphic on the slide with the quote from Psalm 32. I keep looking in the Media Browser for images like David, Abraham, Jesus etc. Either I'm looking in the wrong place, or the images that are there are mostly contemporary (as much as I love C.S. Lewis, I'm far more likely to need a Jesus teaching by the sea of Galilee image than a Lewis profile shot). If the sermon editor is going to save me some real time, it needs to become the point where the words and images come together. I put an hour a week into hunting down images, that's real time that could be saved.
I've always considered Prezi to be the best tool for making visual sermon material. It excels at making text at least semi interesting. Zooming in and out, builds using motion, embedding text in images. Right now the sermon editor / Proclaim combination is just way too static to be engaging. Its true that I invest no extra time in generating visual components with the current tools, but as sermons become more mashup events using AV snippets and compelling storytelling supported by visual elements, what people find interesting or helpful will become more complex. Integrating the word aspect which tends to be the process from my study of texts with the visual elements that are such a part of how we now consume information is fallow ground for innovation. I hope that's the gap into which the Sermon Editor and other tools are targeted.