Query about Confessional Cross-References

Damian McGrath
Damian McGrath Member Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭
edited November 2024 in English Forum

The Systematic Theologies dataset provides references according to Patristics and Medieval. The Confessional dataset does not. It provides a very limited “ecumenical” section. Why is there not a section for early church and medieval?

Ad exemplum, to find a reference to Matthew 16:17 at the Second Council at Orange in 529, I have to look at Modern Catholic under the fourth volume of A History of the Councils of the Church.

Also, the term Ecumenical is anachronistic. I would expect documents from ecumenical discussions in this section (if Logos carried them).

Comments

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 55,539

    another post without response

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • Rick Brannan (Logos)
    Rick Brannan (Logos) Member, Logos Employee Posts: 1,862

    The Systematic Theologies dataset provides references according to Patristics and Medieval. The Confessional dataset does not. It provides a very limited “ecumenical” section. Why is there not a section for early church and medieval?

    The basic problem is that *everybody* claims the "ecumenical" creeds, hence the section. Patristic (or Medieval) didn't make sense because these are claimed by all sorts of groups across the whole of church history.

    The best solution? Maybe not. But we didn't think that Patristic/Medieval divide from the other theology cross-reference datasets was the best approach either.

    Rick Brannan
    Data Wrangler, Faithlife
    My books in print