How would I do a search for every occurrence in Romans 1:1-6:11 either explicitly or implied that refers to our position in Christ or our new standing after becoming a believer?
mm.
I wonder if that question is "constrained enough" to be the subject of a search?
For example - you could want to include:
And you also are among those who are called to belong to Jesus Christ. (Romans 1:6)
I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. (Romans 1:16)
This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, (Romans 3:22)
These could all, potentially, satisfy your stated criteria but I would struggle to construct a search that would find them all
I think you may be better off reading the passages and marking ones you find that match what you are looking for
Thanks and probably a better? way to do an inductive study anyway. To be frank, I'm finding my inductive skills are being dulled a tad the more I lean on L7/LN to do the work for me. Don't get me wrong, I uber like the FL product, but sometimes I miss a hard copy of a Bible and a pad of paper and pencil on a dark oak desk with the aroma of coffee floating in the air.
Maybe the new ways aren't always the best way for everyone - [;)]
but sometimes I miss a hard copy of a Bible and a pad of paper and pencil on a dark oak desk with the aroma of coffee floating in the air.
No reason you can't use Logos and drink coffee at the same time[:)]
Maybe the new ways aren't always the best way for everyone
I think the appropriate way - in any particular context - is the best way. And appropriate may vary for people and particular projects.
Fair enough.
And if you choose Logos to do so you could also add a Label every time you come across an occurrence. Once you have done that you can easily find and combine all those labeled verses together.
This is NOT the answer to your question quite yet, but is intended as a suggestive approach to achieving it (I don't have more time to spend on this right now):
Again, exploring the context menu in a pertinent passage can give you ideas.
I don't have the Concordance or Bible browser: would not these give you possibilities as well?
And what about the Theology section?
Found Preaching Themes Faith and Scripture include Romans 1:6, Romans 1:16, and Romans 3:22
{Section <PreachingTheme = Faith>}
{Section <PreachingTheme = Scripture>}
Keep Smiling [:)]
(<Person A Believer>,<Person Church at Rome>) OR (<Sense = trust in the gospel>, <Sense = trust (faith)>,<Sense = righteousness (state)>,<Sense = to be justified>,<Sense = to be reconciled>,<Sense = to be saved (state)>,<Sense = to live>,<Sense = to be alive>,<Sense = to live together>)
Using OR in search causes result Person and Sense to have different search result colors.
Again, exploring the context menu in a pertinent passage can give you ideas. (<Person A Believer>,<Person Church at Rome>) OR (<Sense = trust in the gospel>, <Sense = trust (faith)>,<Sense = righteousness (state)>,<Sense = to be justified>,<Sense = to be reconciled>,<Sense = to be saved (state)>,<Sense = to live>,<Sense = to be alive>,<Sense = to live together>)
Added another Person:
(<Person A Believer>,<Person Church at Rome>,<Person A Righteous Person>) OR (<Sense = trust in the gospel>, <Sense = trust (faith)>,<Sense = righteousness (state)>,<Sense = to be justified>,<Sense = to be reconciled>,<Sense = to be saved (state)>,<Sense = to live>,<Sense = to be alive>,<Sense = to live together>)
but sometimes I miss a hard copy of a Bible and a pad of paper and pencil on a dark oak desk with the aroma of coffee floating in the air. No reason you can't use Logos and drink coffee at the same time Maybe the new ways aren't always the best way for everyone I think the appropriate way - in any particular context - is the best way. And appropriate may vary for people and particular projects.
No reason you can't use Logos and drink coffee at the same time
I agree that the best way varies, but man there is nothing like paper and pen when observing the text. Like the OP, I find that without it, my inductive skills wane and I miss out on so much interaction with the text. And that's why I actually never start in Logos when I want to study a passage....not even with just a digital Bible open. I have found that the "filters" do the work for me that I should be doing. Instead, I go straight for the print Bible (I use an inductive Bible or I print out the passage I'm studying by making "observation worksheets" and work with the text with just pens). THEN I go to Logos after I've observed the text that way. Why? "A pencil is the best of eyes."
Awesome reply! I like your quote: "'A pencil is the best of eyes.'"
but sometimes I miss a hard copy of a Bible and a pad of paper and pencil on a dark oak desk with the aroma of coffee floating in the air. No reason you can't use Logos and drink coffee at the same time Maybe the new ways aren't always the best way for everyone I think the appropriate way - in any particular context - is the best way. And appropriate may vary for people and particular projects. I agree that the best way varies, but man there is nothing like paper and pen when observing the text. Like the OP, I find that without it, my inductive skills wane and I miss out on so much interaction with the text. And that's why I actually never start in Logos when I want to study a passage....not even with just a digital Bible open. I have found that the "filters" do the work for me that I should be doing. Instead, I go straight for the print Bible (I use an inductive Bible or I print out the passage I'm studying by making "observation worksheets" and work with the text with just pens). THEN I go to Logos after I've observed the text that way. Why? "A pencil is the best of eyes."
Awesome reply! I like your quote: "'A pencil is the best of eyes.'" but sometimes I miss a hard copy of a Bible and a pad of paper and pencil on a dark oak desk with the aroma of coffee floating in the air. No reason you can't use Logos and drink coffee at the same time Maybe the new ways aren't always the best way for everyone I think the appropriate way - in any particular context - is the best way. And appropriate may vary for people and particular projects. I agree that the best way varies, but man there is nothing like paper and pen when observing the text. Like the OP, I find that without it, my inductive skills wane and I miss out on so much interaction with the text. And that's why I actually never start in Logos when I want to study a passage....not even with just a digital Bible open. I have found that the "filters" do the work for me that I should be doing. Instead, I go straight for the print Bible (I use an inductive Bible or I print out the passage I'm studying by making "observation worksheets" and work with the text with just pens). THEN I go to Logos after I've observed the text that way. Why? "A pencil is the best of eyes."
It's by Agassiz. You can read "The Student, the Fish, and Agassiz," which is a famous short story regarding observation, here.
http://people.bethel.edu/~dhoward/resources/Agassizfish/Agassizfish.htm
Milkman, my post is your fault, so no apologies for getting completely and unbelievably off-track.
Your Roman's issue lead to pencils. Then, Cynthia's pencil quote led to Louis Agassiz. Mr Agassiz led to the mountain here we hiked as children. He was a naturalist. And that led to 'polygenism'. That in turn, led to Biblical polygenism ...which I could not even imagine could exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygenism
Ok, back to Romans.
I'm texting this as I work so don't go blaming the milkman for this [:)]
I get enough complaints, not really, about sour milk at the door. I had to do the wiki thang to understand what polygenism is. Learn something new everyday.
For a moment I thought you meant to say homogenous which being a milkman I totally got, but alas...
Remember kids, drink your milk it makes for strong bones and teeth.
Had to step outside my truck to get better reception for texting.
anyway back to work I go.
Milkman, my post is your fault, so no apologies for getting completely and unbelievably off-track. Your Roman's issue lead to pencils. Then, Cynthia's pencil quote led to Louis Agassiz. Mr Agassiz led to the mountain here we hiked as children. He was a naturalist. And that led to 'polygenism'. That in turn, led to Biblical polygenism ...which I could not even imagine could exist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygenism Ok, back to Romans.
Thankful for Logos visual filter option to hide chapter and verse numbers, which can be printed:
Reading in Logos allows click on a word to show chapter and verse location.
Thankful for Discourse Greek visual filter set that can be used in Bibles with Reverse Interlinear tagging:
Thankful for option to customize Discourse Marker pop-up text => Smiling with custom pop-ups in the Lexham Discourse Greek NT and => Suggestion: Discourse Greek NT more customizable
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
