Lexham Bible Guide isn't linking to ACCS

The Lexham Bible Guide for Romans on Romans 11:26 is saying that I don't have ACCS Romans, so won't expand this link for me: Bray (1998, 297–99).

In fact, I have the ACCS twice - once that I purchased on a CD-ROM and once that was provided as updates of this. I can see both copies in my library.

So, why isn't the link working?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

DAL

Talking about Lexham...I had a nightmare. I dreamed FL had changed the name Logos Bible Software to Lexham Bible Software to match their publishing name...Ah!!! I hope that never happens!

DAL

Ps. Yep, very random comment, I know 😁

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/874462#Comment_874462

I'll take a look at this. I probably won't have an answer until tomorrow.

Travis Walter

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/874470#Comment_874470

I can confirm this also.

The link is pointing to a resource called ACCSNT06

Should be ACCSREVNT06

BriM

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/874470#Comment_874470

Kyle, is this likely to get fixed?

Simon’s Brother

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/874548#Comment_874548

I have three different versions of this resource in my library. Can someone raise me a fourth?

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/876730#Comment_876730

Kyle, is this likely to get fixed?

Technically it should not be - the reference is to the original edition; you want it to access the revised edition. If the linked text has changed you'll get misleading results.

Travis Walter

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/876772#Comment_876772

I have the same 3 resources..

the Original is ACCSREVNT06.

The name of the resource is REV go figure.. thats the issue.. the original has a resource name of REV.

Simon’s Brother

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/876813#Comment_876813

I have the same 3 resources..

the Original is ACCSREVNT06.

The name of the resource is REV go figure.. thats the issue.. the original has a resource name of REV.

As I understand the REV is meant to refer to revised, and not Revelation.

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/876816#Comment_876816

It's on the list to get fixed. I was hoping to have it fixed by now but there's a few other projects that have been lingering ahead of it.

BriM

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/876876#Comment_876876

Thanks Kyle.