Is John Frame's systematic theology a condensed version of his theology of Lordship 4 volumes? If so which one would you choose? Or, is it worth having them all? Thanks for any input!
DAL
Frame's Systematic Theology would obviously be theologically consistent with this other books, but other than the section on the doctrine of the knowledge of God, it does not cover the same material. Its sections follow the traditional systematic categories. But this is the type of reference book that has great value to me (like other commentaries, dictionaries, and systematic theologies). So I would highly recommend its purchase.
So here's a new question: if you had to choose between John Frame's systematic theology and Norman Geisler's systematic theology which one would you choose?
I have read extensively from both authors, but neither of their systematic theologies. From their other readings, I would consider Geisler to probably have more of a practical bent and Frame to have more of a philosophical, or technical view.
And of course, if you follow Frame, expect everything to be broken up into three categories. After all, he is a true trinitarian at heart. [:)] [He jokes about this himself during his lectures.]
...expect everything to be broken up into three categories. After all, he is a true trinitarian at heart. [He jokes about this himself during his lectures.]
Yes, so I've noticed LOL. I may get both systematic theologies, and then the other works by Frame later. I definitely love how practical Geisler is and his ST 4 volumes is outlined better so that it makes it very teachable. I'm trying to get a couple more systematic theologies and these two would be great. One calvinistic (Frame) the other non calvinistic (Geisler).
Thanks for the input both of you.
Hey DAL,
I own all the Theology of Lordship Series and Frame's systematic theology. And yes, whilst there is some overlap, his ST is certainly not a rehashing of old material into a new format.
His ST is also very practical and pastoral in places.
Hey DAL, I own all the Theology of Lordship Series and Frame's systematic theology. And yes, whilst there is some overlap, his ST is certainly not a rehashing of old material into a new format. His ST is also very practical and pastoral in places.
Thanks LMAM! I went ahead and got Geisler's ST all 4 volumes and I will definitely add Frame's ST to my library. The other books on the Theology of Lordship will be added too, but those can wait. Thanks for your input too!
Blessings!
I would have voted Frame. Personally I felt Geisler's ST weren't deep enough and left too many holes. I had to go to many other references to round out what he said. I haven't touched mine in several years.
So here's a new question: if you had to choose between John Frame's systematic theology and Norman Geisler's systematic theology which one would you choose? DAL
I would choose Frame. This is not because he is better in every place or I agree with him, but he truly makes me think and offers very unique observations and implications of familiar theological truths. I've greatly enjoyed and been challenged by reading John Frame. His works are particularly well suited for reading in Logos
This discussion interests me with systematic theology.
I got the best of both worlds! A free compact version of Frame's ST, the full ST along with his Theology of Lordship book series all for $100 and change! I'm glad his books are on sale this month. That should compliment Geisler's ST and the other ST volumes from different authors I own 😁 I'm a happy camper now.
Thanks FL for the sale!
I don't know much on frame but I love Geisler's. It is great when it comes to apologetics and covers a lot of what ifs.
https://www.logos.com/product/48797/reformed-dogmatics
What about logos new reformed one?
...expect everything to be broken up into three categories. After all, he is a true trinitarian at heart. [He jokes about this himself during his lectures.] Yes, so I've noticed LOL. I may get both systematic theologies, and then the other works by Frame later. I definitely love how practical Geisler is and his ST 4 volumes is outlined better so that it makes it very teachable. I'm trying to get a couple more systematic theologies and these two would be great. One calvinistic (Frame) the other non calvinistic (Geisler). Thanks for the input both of you. DAL
When I was in seminary and taking classes with John, everything was a triad. [:)]
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
