BWS problem with BHSsesb

I'm having a problem with the BWS when running reports on Hebrew words in BHSsesb. If I run a BWS on a Hebrew word in BHSwestminster4.2, I get full results (i.e. every section of the reports has results). Not so with BHSsesb. In the screen shot below, notice that I get zero hits in the graph portion of the lemma section. None of the other sections work either (with the exception of textual searches).

My prioritized resources are as follows: NA27sesb, TNIV, BHSsesb)

I'm running 4.0b SR-1

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Dave Hooton

What is the Hebrew Bible that gives 254 results (click on the link to run the search)?

Brian Davidson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/111086#Comment_111086

Surprisingly, it is BHSsesb!

Could the problem be that the other sections of this report are set up to use a different morphology?

Brian Davidson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/111086#Comment_111086

Ok, when I click on the graph portion of the lemma section this is what I get. Notice there is no resource selected in the "lemma:מלא in ____" part (1st picture below). When I click on the little arrow beside "in" no resources appear -- just a little box.

Brian Davidson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/111090#Comment_111090

Here is a pic of what happens when I click the little arrow. See the little box that appears beside "in"

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/111087#Comment_111087

The LEMMA section will look for lemma מלא in ESV, which is actually a homonym search (lemma:מלא.1) to get the 259 results when I run from BHS 4.2. I don't have SESB, so when you click on 0 in LEMMA what is the lemma search above the graph?

EDIT: our posts crossed. Somehow it is not setup to run from the ESV

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/111092#Comment_111092

What is the morphology of BHS SESB (see its Resource Information)?

A clue to the issue may lie in the last post of this thread http://community.logos.com/forums/p/4682/36775.aspx

Hopefully others can comment on this.

Brian Davidson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/111094#Comment_111094

Dave, thanks for your feedback. Perhaps this is an SESB issue as the last comment in the thread you linked to might suggest.

To answer your question about the morphology. SESB has their own morphology for BHS. It's just called SESB.