Original PL's
Add stealth to stare results in
16 verses instead of 13 (Sort reduces to 12 passages as expected).
Which merge option did you choose?
I had duplicates produced when I tried to move a passage somewhere else in the list. If I drag the reference area, it creates a duplicate. If I drag from the verse text area, it moves the item. Personally I would prefer to leave it this way because occasionally I do want a verse in the list twice. This may be intentional, but I thought I'd mention it since there was a thread dealing with duplicates anyway. I recognize this is a separate issue from the original poster.
'twas not Merge
Add stealth to stare ....
Add > 'Add passages from ...another passage list' is more simple than the Merge function. It will add, but not determine what is already there. You'll probably want to use Merge instead, and choose Union.
I believe if you click sort it will get rid of duplicates (at least that's the way I remember it behaving back when I was just experimenting in Beta 1)
You are correct. Thanks!
My observation is that Add copied the three source passages TWICE ie. 16 passages instead of 13 in the destination PL.
If you click on Sort, though, does it remove the duplicate passages?
Melissa,
ALL the information is in my original post.
The BUG is easily reproduced if you construct PL's as indicated and Add one PL to the other!
Dave, I reconstructed what you did in your OP, but I'm not getting duplicates unless I add stealth more than once, which is by design. Are you getting these duplicates with other lists, or just this scenario?
This is all I do:
on this occasion I had closed Stealth (3 passages) but still ended up with 16 passages in Stare.
If I similarly Add Stare (10 passages) to Stealth (3) it ends up with 23 passages. I see 10 added then another 10, all from a single mouse click. I try it with other PL's in the menu and only once does it do what is expected. If this is a mouse-click phenomenon then I don't have the issue anywhere else, and I was deliberately performing a positive single click.
Ok, after playing with this little more I was able to reproduce the duplication. We'll look into it.
Thanks, Darren
