Historical church documents - or PBB's soon

MJ. Smith
MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,795
edited December 2024 in English Forum

By this I mean as many official statements from as many denominations as possible. On another thread I had an interesting exchange on when the canon was set and whether or not all books in the canon were divinely inspired. The answer was that I was wrong - Byzantine ecumenical council has taken a stance that I was unaware of. (This stance strengthens the Protestant view of the deuterocanonicals while muddying the waters as to what constitutes the canon - they approved six).

It would have been ever so nice if Mark and I had been able to do searches within Logos to find the relevant information. While this particular document may be a bit esoteric the fact is that Anglican, Lutheran, Mennonite, Presbyterian, etc. documents would be a great deal of help. Several position papers, creeds etc. directly reflect Bible interpretation so these do fall within the main stream of Logos.

If Logos doesn't wish to do this, I would like us (the users) to work cooperatively to get documents into PBB format - there is enough breadth of belief and interests we ought to be able to do a good job. We'd need to agree to a set of conventions and a way to publish them without creating thousands of resources but I think it's doable.

Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

Comments

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,980 ✭✭✭

    Martha,

    It sounds like a good idea.  Something like a WIKI that could be edited and re-arranged into one large community edited book of Historical Church documents?

    We would need:

    1) A general editor to be in charge of the whole project

    2) specific goals

    3) defined conventions for exactly how each submission (chapter) is constructed

    • This is dependant on whatever schema Logos uses for PBB
    • What must be tagged, etc.  What is minimally acceptable.

    4) A community place to build and edit such a repository.

    Using basic HTML Instead of WIKI I already have the technology for building HTML "Books" running on my website.  Feel free to take a look at the "Series" section and envision any number of sister and sub documents.

    IOW, I'm offering stilltruth to be the repository and editing platform - but you will NOT hurt my feelings if you have something else in mind.  Nor do I particularly crave the task of general editor.

     

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you.