Ron I spent hours trying to fix mine but kept resulting with a superscript Yahweh on a Yahweh. I could never fix it either.
Changing LORD to Yahweh
Comments
-
Thanks for the reply Paul. It seems that it was the filters for "the", "O", and "O Lord" that were causing the issue...so I went another route and had it place YHWH, Elohim, and Adonai below the English words at 60% in dark gray instead of trying to fiddle with replacing and hiding the English. Thanks for the help! [:)]
BTW, does anyone have any other neat visual filters they've come up with? I've got the "main verb" one that was suggested in a blog post a while back, the names of God one (that I'm working on expanding to cover all the OT and NT names), the words for love, doulos, plural pronouns and plural verbs.
0 -
Ron Keyston Jr said:
BTW, does anyone have any other neat visual filters they've come up with?
Wiki Extended Tips for Visual Filters => Examples of visual filters includes Logos Greek Morphology, Discourse Analysis, and Herod visual filter examples.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
One filter finds all OT occurrences of "the Lord" in English and the second creates the insert for YHWH.
Except they don't always match, do they?
If you do it this way, they match:
That gives me:
And if I set the color to white and the size to 20% (in addition to the superscript) in the first style, I can make the original text practically disappear:
(Although having a white style in the styles list also makes the style entry seem to disappear [:^)] )
Todd Phillips said:If you do it this way, they match:
That gives me:
And if I set the color to white and the size to 20% (in addition to the superscript) in the first style, I can make the original text practically disappear:
(Although having a white style in the styles list also makes the style entry seem to disappear
)Hello
I Really enjoy the Mark-up and Visual Filter tools available. I would like to see the following updates if possible.
1) I would like to see the Above example made available as a "Compound" feature, available within the 'Same' Highlighting Style. As opposed to two separate ones for the same result.
2) I have noticed when 'Editing' a particular Highlighting Style, after Saving the particular style edited is removed from the Visual Filter's 'Selected' list , requiring treselection. (when open).
3) The 'editing' of the Original word (now Super-scripted) would be useful. (the incorporation of parenthesis around this word while Super-scripted, at times, for example)
4) When 'Choosing' a Custom Highlight for use, one Must scroll through entire list of 'Highlights' inn order to make selection (could be awhile if your list is longer than default - and even then a bit of a burden, sometimes). Maybe a compound list could be provided, where upon selection of the 'Highlighter' List a menu would present itself to offer the selection of either "Default" or "Custom" Highlighters to choose from, therefore separating the desired from the undesired at the moment and further simplifying this process. Secondly, once the desired list is selected, have only the 'Pallet Names' displayed with the Option of unveiling their sub-categories.
5) and Lastly, I too have experienced the 'White Out' (Invisible) response. Maybe instead the present Display for "Invisible" font, there could be a 'Replacement' description : i.e. "Super-scripted - White - 20%"
0 -
One filter finds all OT occurrences of "the Lord" in English and the second creates the insert for YHWH.
Except they don't always match, do they?
If you do it this way, they match:
That gives me:
And if I set the color to white and the size to 20% (in addition to the superscript) in the first style, I can make the original text practically disappear:
(Although having a white style in the styles list also makes the style entry seem to disappear
)Hello
I Really enjoy the Mark-up and Visual Filter tools available. I would like to see the following updates if possible.
1) I would like to see the Above example made available as a "Compound" feature, available within the 'Same' Highlighting Style. As opposed to two separate ones for the same result.
2) I have noticed when 'Editing' a particular Highlighting Style, after Saving the particular style edited is removed from the Visual Filter's 'Selected' list , requiring treselection. (when open).
3) The 'editing' of the Original word (now Super-scripted) would be useful. (the incorporation of parenthesis around this word while Super-scripted, at times, for example)
4) When 'Choosing' a Custom Highlight for use, one Must scroll through entire list of 'Highlights' inn order to make selection (could be awhile if your list is longer than default - and even then a bit of a burden, sometimes). Maybe a compound list could be provided, where upon selection of the 'Highlighter' List a menu would present itself to offer the selection of either "Default" or "Custom" Highlighters to choose from, therefore separating the desired from the undesired at the moment and further simplifying this process. Secondly, once the desired list is selected, have only the 'Pallet Names' displayed with the Option of unveiling their sub-categories.
5) and Lastly, I too have experienced the 'White Out' (Invisible) response. Maybe instead the present Display for "Invisible" font, there could be a 'Replacement' description : i.e. "Super-scripted - White - 20%"
**Would be nice to be able to access the Visual Filter and or Markup editing options from the right click menu
Thank You.
0 -
Douglas said:
2) I have noticed when 'Editing' a particular Highlighting Style, after Saving the particular style edited is removed from the Visual Filter's 'Selected' list , requiring treselection. (when open).
Looking forward to Logos 4.5 Beta testing in two to few weeks that includes fix for => Bug: Logos 4.2a Beta 6 Visual Filters
Douglas said:3) The 'editing' of the Original word (now Super-scripted) would be useful. (the incorporation of parenthesis around this word while Super-scripted, at times, for example)
Option: can add Borders and Lines to Original Word, including box (with choices of line formats):
Douglas said:4) When 'Choosing' a Custom Highlight for use, one Must scroll through entire list of 'Highlights' inn order to make selection (could be awhile if your list is longer than default - and even then a bit of a burden, sometimes). Maybe a compound list could be provided, where upon selection of the 'Highlighter' List a menu would present itself to offer the selection of either "Default" or "Custom" Highlighters to choose from, therefore separating the desired from the undesired at the moment and further simplifying this process. Secondly, once the desired list is selected, have only the 'Pallet Names' displayed with the Option of unveiling their sub-categories.
Wish drop down list could look at Highlighting Tool, skip over highlighting styles in collapsed sections.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
I tried duplicating these filters to no avail. is it possible to also get a look at the highlight setups? the only one that ever works is the original YHWH to Lord highlight filter example.
0 -
Garcia,
It might be easier to how us your visual filter document and a place in a book it isn't performing as expected. It might take 2 or 3 screenshots to show us everything but we should be able to notice what you need to tweak in order to get what you want.
Instructions on uploading screenshots to the forum http://wiki.logos.com/screenshot
Prov. 15:23
0 -
So I tried doing this with Adonia but the filter doesn't seem to work. Here are my setups. I thank you in advance for your help.
highlight
Here is my filter.
Ideally I would like to combine the YHWH with Adonia filters but will settle for two separate filters. Again, thanks for your help.
So not sure why my screen shots did not show up.
0 -
another attempt at including screen shots.
filter
Highlight
0 -
Regarding screen shots, make certain you attach (via the paperclip) the image file instead of pasting into the forum editor.
There reason why your adonai filter doesn't work is because the morph scheme for the reverse interlinears differentiates between different occurrences of adonai. Right click on an occurrence of adonai.
So, that's why a the simple adn search doesn't work. To get the term that will work do this
Prov. 15:23
0 -
Thanks for your assistance, it did the trick.
0 -
Could you explain the three different "Elohim" you used and how they were created? Thank You for your time.
0
