The new tab interface design is great! I always have several tabs opened and find it really enhances the use and functionality of the mobile app. However, there is a problem with the link feature when used on a split tab...
I use a split tab for my primary bible reading, with a bible in the top & commentary in the bottom. Both halves of this tab are linked and I have "Scroll View" is on. When I open a verse from my bible reading plan (or any other hyperlink) the specified verse is very often not visible in bottom linked part of the tab. The linked portions of the tab are usually several verses off from each other, and when I scroll the bottom screen to the correct position, I loose my place in the top screen since it scrolls to the incorrect place where the other one started! This problem is not limited to my Bible & commentary but other resources as well (such as; two Bible versions linked to each other) and also occurs when I'm just scrolling as I read.
The app is apparently not designed to link each split to the first visible verse (which it should be), but rather it is linked by some (seemingly random) group of verses which includes the targeted verse. In the screen shot below you can see 2 linked Bible versions which were supposed to be viewing Matt 19:1 from a clicked hyperlink in a search tab. But 19:1 isn't even visible in the bottom of the screen because the app did not go to verse 19:1 (even though this was the link which was clicked) instead it went to the range Matt 18:24-19:2. That's just poor design.
Much of the time, this design results in not being able to view the same passage in each part of the split screen - which is the very purpose of linking a split screen to begin with, is it not?
This behavior occurs on both my android devices:
- Asus ZenPad 8 tablet, Android 7.0 - Logos Bible version 6.5.1 (build 605011191)
- Samsung Galaxy J7 Sky phone, Android 6.0.1 - Logos Bible version 6.4.1 (build 604011131)
It would be really great if a developer could address this issue in the near future, as it seriously detracts from an otherwise excellent interface design.
Thanks!
