Is this a bug (tagging or in process for Referred To As)? Or do I simply need an explanation?

MJ. Smith

In this case:

1. Why does the entry "one man" occur twice referring to different verses
2. Why does the second "one man" entry highlight "one" where there is no "man" to be found?
3. Why doesn't 5:19 highlight the second "one man's"?
4. Why is the possessive counted for "one man's sin" but not for "one man's disobedience" or "one man's trespass"?

I believe that the devil is in the details ... and in this case the devil struck hard. I'm perplexed.