BUG: Compare Versions vs Passage Analysis

Due to changes over time (lots of time) the contents of my collection "Bible: Top Bibles" has grown to be unwieldly - my fault. But it has highlighted some errors/inconsistencies in Passage Guide --> Compare Versions and Tools -->Passage Analysis --> Version River and Cluster Graph Note: the second screen shot shows the resources that actually include the passage.

Issue 1: in both, a title is shown without a corresponding ball or is it an attempt to assign AMP & ICC the same ball as they lack the passage?

Issue 2: in both, a ball is shown (AMP) for a translation that does not contain the passage at all

Issue 3: in Passage Guide --> Compare Version, no river chart is attempted; there is an accurate one in the Tool form

Issue 4: in Passage Guide --> the resizing is limited making it difficult to make the map clear

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Jeffrey S. Robison

Has there been any answers to all of your questions as to the when of the data errors will be fixed? And thanks for putting it through the paces!

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/994949#Comment_994949

Has there been any answers to all of your questions as to the when of the data errors will be fixed?

A few have actual dates for corrections; a few have yet to be acknowledged; the rest are in the queque. But if they take too long, I can visit my grandson who is going to college in Bellingham and make a little side trip to the Faithlife offices ...

EastTN

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/994962#Comment_994962

Has there been any answers to all of your questions as to the when of the data errors will be fixed?

A few have actual dates for corrections; a few have yet to be acknowledged; the rest are in the queque. But if they take too long, I can visit my grandson who is going to college in Bellingham and make a little side trip to the Faithlife offices ...

Thank you for all of your work chasing down issues like this.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/994964#Comment_994964

This needs re-testing

Nick Steffen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1085819#Comment_1085819

I tried including multi-volume translations of older texts for comparison (e.g. Aramaic Bible, Antioch Bible) and have found that the river includes lines for each volume, even when the given passage does not exist in that volume. This effectively reduces the usefulness of the river.

Nick Steffen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1085819#Comment_1085819

Issue #2 still seems to be a concern as I posted earlier.

Philana R. Crouch

We do have a bug report dealing with the issue of displaying Bible versions that do not contain the reference. I have added a link to this thread to the case.

Nick Steffen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1107197#Comment_1107197

Thank you, Philana!

Nick Steffen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1107206#Comment_1107206

I just tested the river functionality using The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts as the Bible for Matthew 1 and received the following result.

Although Matthew 1 is contained only in P1, all of the texts in that series have lines in the river.