Some are working and some not. I called FL this morning and they too could replicate the issue and they/she assured me that they were working toward resolving the issue.
Well Milkman they still are not linked. Most (I would say over half) links just tell you the name to the title, they are not even linked to the book much less the article. I did check a couple of other threads and this has been a problem for sometime now. But on the website it still states:
All references to commentaries and lexicons are linked to your digital titles.
I don't know what that means to logos, but they are supposed to be linked to my books!!! Maybe they have a different definition for "all".
Most (I would say over half) links just tell you the name to the title, they are not even linked to the book much less the article.
Isn't that just an indication of when they were last updated? The oldest resources show no indication of a link unless there is a specific active link, the middle aged resources shown the resource only when there is no active link, the newest resources tend to have the most active links because very little has been added since they were indexed. Or do you have examples of ancient resources - in place before the Exegetical summaries - that are not linked?
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Well Milkman they still are not linked. Most (I would say over half) links just tell you the name to the title, they are not even linked to the book much less the article. I did check a couple of other threads and this has been a problem for sometime now. But on the website it still states:
All references to commentaries and lexicons are linked to your digital titles.
I don't know what that means to logos, but they are supposed to be linked to my books!!! Maybe they have a different definition for "all".
Could you give me an example? I've spot checked a few and I'm not sure what you're seeing.
I'm not clear what is or isn't working for you but my hunch is that it will be solved by this thread: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/148119.aspx
Thanks for the thread.
Some are working and some not. I called FL this morning and they too could replicate the issue and they/she assured me that they were working toward resolving the issue.
Well Milkman they still are not linked. Most (I would say over half) links just tell you the name to the title, they are not even linked to the book much less the article. I did check a couple of other threads and this has been a problem for sometime now. But on the website it still states:
All references to commentaries and lexicons are linked to your digital titles.
I don't know what that means to logos, but they are supposed to be linked to my books!!! Maybe they have a different definition for "all".
Isn't that just an indication of when they were last updated? The oldest resources show no indication of a link unless there is a specific active link, the middle aged resources shown the resource only when there is no active link, the newest resources tend to have the most active links because very little has been added since they were indexed. Or do you have examples of ancient resources - in place before the Exegetical summaries - that are not linked?
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Could you give me an example? I've spot checked a few and I'm not sure what you're seeing.