Address bar inconsistent

I just checked going to a passage using the address bar in both the LXX with Logos morphology and with Gramcord morphology. I found the same situation in each: Some addresses will work while others will not. I could go to Is 7.14, but not to Kg 2.5. I also attempted to use the Greek titles without success. Entering Jer 1.5 produces Jer 1.1. The results for other resources are unknown at this time.

Find more posts tagged with

Performance

Comments

Melissa Snyder

Hi George,

To find 1 or 2 Kings in the LXX, you want to type '3 kingdoms' (1 Kings) or '4 kingdoms' (2 Kings) in the reference box. I've included a screenshot showing the LXX with Logos Morphology, the Parallel Aligned Hebrew-Aramica and Greek Texts, and ESV linked and side-by-side. When I enter 'jer 1.5', the visual cue displays at verse 5, and 'Jeremiah 1.5' is in the current reference box.

Melissa

George Somsel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/14170#Comment_14170

Hi George,

To find 1 or 2 Kings in the LXX, you want to type '3 kingdoms' (1 Kings) or '4 kingdoms' (2 Kings) in the reference box. I've included a screenshot showing the LXX with Logos Morphology, the Parallel Aligned Hebrew-Aramica and Greek Texts, and ESV linked and side-by-side. When I enter 'jer 1.5', the visual cue displays at verse 5, and 'Jeremiah 1.5' is in the current reference box.

Melissa

The JW version (Kingdoms) might be a legitimate alternative, but it is not in keeping either with the general practice in other bibles nor in v. 3.0 that 1 Kg or 1 Kings would not work. I would suggest that this be changed.

You may get Jer 1.5 on your machine with your version of 4.0, but I still get Jer 1.1.

Melissa Snyder

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/14174#Comment_14174

Typing '1 kg 2:5' will work (requires the '1' or '2' in front) -- but it will show '3 Kingdoms' as the match. I'm not sure why '1 Kings' does not appear as it does in LDLS 3, but I can check into it. As far as 'Jer 1.5', it may be that the resource didn't get updated on your system, but we should have the same version of Beta 3 (if you've updated to Beta 3).

Melissa

Jon

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/14174#Comment_14174

The JW version (Kingdoms) might be a legitimate alternative, but it is not in keeping either with the general practice in other bibles nor in v. 3.0 that 1 Kg or 1 Kings would not work. I would suggest that this be changed.

It isn't in keeping with general practice in other bibles which follow the MT names, but nor should it be... I guess it's a question of balancing accuracy with ease-of-use. Displaying 1-4 Kingdoms for 1 Samuel - 2 Kings accurately reflects what they were named in LXX. In terms of navigation it still works if you type 1,2 Sam or 1,2 Kings. So I think the balance is right.